GAZA TRIBUNAL PROJECT: Opening Remarks and Sarajevo Program, May 26-29, 2025

27 May

Opening Remarks, Richard Falk, Sarajevo Public Session of Gaza Tribunal, 26 May 2025

Members of the Gaza Tribunal, Ladies and Gentlemen, Persons of Conscience Throughout the World, and Rector Ahmed Yildirim. It is my honor to welcome you to the opening day of the Sarajevo Public Session of the Gaza Tribunal. It is with great regret that I am not physically present in Sarajevo. I wish that I could be with you in person, but an unforeseen family accident disrupted my travel plans.

The purpose of the Gaza Tribunal is to add credibility to the torment and outrage of people throughout the world and do are part to bringing the Gaza ordeal of death and devastation to an end. Among our goals is to motivate nonviolent action performed with a goal of exerting pressure on Israel to desist from genocide. We commit ourselves to this goal in the name of our common humanity.

We are most grateful to the International University of Sarajevo, and particularly Rector Yildirim for hosting our presence on this historic campus. We are of course mindful of Sarajevo’s and Bosnia’s recent past and its symbolic relevance to the tragic fate that has befallen the Palestinian all of whom have are living as permanent refugees or as persecuted strangers in their own homeland. In the spirit of solemn acknowledgement, we should pay homage today 30 years after the willful massacre of 8,000 male Bosnians at Srebrenica for no reason other than their nationality and religion.

In the present period already lasting more than 19 months the eyes and ears of the world have been exposed to daily atrocities victimizing the besieged crowded, impoverished, and tiny Gaza Strip. Earlier genocides, including the Holocaust, were mostly known in retrospect by way of survivor stories and reconstructed images of the horrors experienced by the victims. This was a macabre contrast to the devastation of Gaza reported by the hour in words and images. Day after day the unspeakable suffering of Palestine’s remarkably resilient and resisting people disoriented persons of conscience by its transparent spectacles of evil. This impact was worsened by being brought to human awareness in real time.

Shamelessly, Israel made little attempt to hide its genocidal intentions or disguise its genocidal tactics. Its leaders and pro-government activists openly declared their goals as killing and maiming Palestinians, whether by bombs or by way of terrifying refusals to allow Gazans to obtain desperately needed food and medical supplies. Its leaders on some occasions sought to justify their behavior be referencing Biblical stories of genocide. Presumably, this was done to provide a hallowed religious precedent for their current operations in Gaza of mass extermination. Israel’s minimum goals were to induce large-scale departures from Occupied Palestine to places as distant as possible from their homeland that has been rendered virtually uninhabitable by repeated bombardment and artillery shelling. The genocidal cast of mind accompanying the military onslaught was manifest. Prominent Israeli citizens and government officials openly compared the mentality accompanying the killing Palestinians to that experienced while killing of cockroaches. Some high-profile Israelis even advocated dropping a nuclear bomb on the densely populated and totally vulnerable people of Gaza. Despite some pretensions to the contrary, the Israeli hostages held by Hamas did not restrain Israel’s violence or move the government toward accepting a permanent ceasefire even after the fury of its campaign went on month after month without achieving its purported original objective of destroying Hamas.

The pleas and warnings of the world’s leading moral authority figures went unheeded by Israel or its supporting governments. These including dedicated pleas from Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIV as well as from the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, and several Nobel Peace Prize winners. These varied revered voices were defiantly scorned by Israel’s government and citizenry, and the massacres in Gaza continued unabated, and even spread to the West Bank.

The UN despite making a variety of responses has not been able to stop the killing, let alone protect the victimized people of Gaza, even its children, women, disabled, and elderly comprising an estimated 70% of Palestinian casualties. The UN has been blocked from taking decisive action by the diplomatic complicity of the North American and European liberal democracies. It has become obvious to all that the UN lacks the independent political will, authority, and capability to override the kind of geopolitical and material impunity given to Israel by the US. As the Israeli rogue behavior persisted the peoples of the world, including in the countries whose governments were openly aligned with Israel, mounted increasingly militant protests. However, the governments that could have made a difference watched the carnage of bodies and rubble pile up without making moves to stop it, and this sadly includes the governments of Israel’s Arab neighbors whose peoples ardently supported the Palestinian liberation struggle while their regimes remained passive. In many instances even maintained positive economic and political links with Israel belying their pretenses of neutrality or verbal opposition.

It is against this background that Gaza Tribunal was established some months ago, launched in London in November of 2024. Since then working with dedication to prepare as well as possible for this public session in Sarajevo. The undertaking can be grasped from the appended ambitious Program of the Tribunal that will unfold over the next four days.

The GT draws inspiration from prior peoples tribunals, most especially from the Russell Tribunal addressing the unlawfulness of US intervention in the Vietnam War, from the Iraq War Tribunal that was prompted by the 2003 regime-changing aggression that brought chaos and misery to the Iraqi people, and from the tireless work of the Permanent Peoples Tribunal of Rome that sponsored and organized comparable civil society inquiries into the leading injustices in the world. This legacy of earlier peoples tribunals had a common core rationale for coming into existence. This rationale also defines the mission of the Gaza Tribunal and can be explained concisely: It is the failure of organized international society to respond to severe injustices by enforcing international law and holding perpetrators and accomplices accountable. In short, these tribunals arise when the governments of leading states and inter-governmental institutions fail or neglect to address severe injustices, especially bearing on war and peace. In essence, people only act in response to international issues when the established order exhibits its moral and legal depravity from the perspective of justice.

It needs to be appreciated that the funding and organization of a people’s tribunal is a daunting challenge for ordinary citizen. Its inherent posture of radical opposition to governmental policy will be rejected harshly by establishment elites, including the corporate media, and often give rise to punitive reactions. That is to say, the reality of the Gaza Tribunal was a project not lightly undertaken by its principal organizers or by participating activists.

Gaza is the leading example, as well as a metaphor for the dying of settler colonialism, and is thus perceived as a dagger struck to the heart of anti-colonial national liberation. It prompted a few countries of the Global South to have recourse to the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, hoping to find formal and authoritative judicial support for their well-documented allegations of genocide and crimes against humanity. Even this progressive reliance on a ‘law and order approach’ turned out to be of little practical benefit in stopping the genocide. The near unanimous rulings and decisions of the ICJ proved to be as unenforceable as were the prior General Assembly ceasefire resolutions. And thus the genocide continue, perpetrators retain de facto impunity, and the complicit governments have the audacity to seek control over day after negotiations.

Yet for opponents of Israel’s policies even these disappointing realities of judicial futility are helpful in this context because authoritative pronouncements of relevant law add symbolic force to the claim that Israel and its supporters have been driven from the high moral and legal ground despite their commanding influence over public discourse by virtue of hasbara manipulations and sympathetic major Western media outlets. Further, since 1945 the side in political conflicts that wins the main legality battles also wins the legitimacy war that informally adjudicates right and wrong. These symbolic victories have turned out to be historically relevant to shaping political outcomes. From the Vietnam War forward the side with military superiority has rarely controlled political outcomes in anti-colonial warfare, however much death and devastation it inflicts in trying for victory. Whether Palestinian resilience, extraordinary as it is,  has the capability to withstand the relentless pressure of Israeli genocide insulated from the enforcement of legal obligations by geopolitical protection, and prepared for by decades of apartheid governance and ethnic cleansing that encountered hardly any pushback from the UN aside from contributions to Palestinian victories in the battlefields of the legitimacy war.

In the coming days we will try to vindicate the establishment of the Gaza Tribunal by striving to add our efforts to rising global opposition to the brutal crimes of a continuing genocide. Can we do otherwise? Only two days ago Israel’s IDF reportedly knowingly targeted the home of two doctors married to one another. The IDF allegedly acted on the basis of surveillance technology that conveyed the knowledge that the house was full of children. While the mother, Alaa de-Najjar, a pediatrician was on duty at the nearby Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, her home was bombed and nine of her ten children were killed by the fire caused by the explosion. The nine bodies of her children were brought to her at the hospital, while her husband critically wounded by the bomb and the singly surviving child, aptly named Adam, were struggling to stay alive. Can any of us rest while such barbarous behavior goes on and on?

Desperate for an end to this genocide I hope many will join me in calling for ‘the gravitas of awakened people’ to do what governments have failed to do, namely, to do all in our power to bring this Palestinian ordeal to an end

We are gathered here in Sarajevo to respond as effectively as we can to what is being increasingly identified as ‘the moral challenge’ of our time. The Gaza ordeal has cast its dark shadow across the entire planet. Our endeavor is to make the experience of the Gaza Tribunal a glimmer of light, an expression of hope against hope.

GAZA TRIBUNAL PROJECT, MAY 26-29, 2025, Sarajevo, Bosnia

 CHAMBER 1
 INTERNATIONAL LAW 
MONDAY, MAY 26
   
9:00-9:30Welcome
Rector of International University of SarajevoAhmet Yıldırım
President of the Islamic Cooperation Youth ForumTaha Ayhan
President of the Gaza TribunalRichard Falk
9:30-10:00Chamber 1 co-Chairs introduce proceedingsMichael Lynk
Susan Akram
10:00-11:45Panel 1: Nakba and Colonial Genocide
GenocideNimer Sultany
Apartheid and Self-DeterminationVictor Kattan (online)
Forced Population TransferTriestino Marinello (online)
Witness testimony: Al Haq Field ResearcherPre-recorded & translated from Arabic
Witness testimonyAhmed Abu Artema
 Witness testimonyKhaled Alhatoun (read by  )
 Witness testimonyAya Abusharakh (read by  )
 Witness testimonySherene Alsafi (read by )
   
11:45-12:15Coffee Break
12:15-14:00Panel 2: Patterns of Genocide
Political PrisonersLisa Hajjar
Right to foodFarah Al-Haddad
Reproductive systemsHeidi Matthews
 Witness testimony (prisoner – Addameer)Diala Ayash (pre-recorded, translated)
 Witness testimony (prisoner – Addameer)Ahmed Khreish (pre-recorded, translated)
 Witness testimony (prisoner – Addameer)Khader Al’ashi (pre-recorded, translated)
 Witness testimony (prisoner – Addameer)Khader Al’ashi (pre-recorded, translated)
 APN witness: Right to FoodWritten testimony read by:
14:00-15:00Lunch
15:00-16:45Panel 3: Specific Acts
Protection of CiviliansMaryam Jamshidi
 Attack on Health InfrastructureHana / read by Wesam Ahmad
Witness testimony: Gaza Soup Kitchen; UNRWA USAHani Almadhoun
Witness testimony: Volunteer physician in GazaDr. Thaer Ahmad
Witness testimony: Volunteer physician in GazaDr. Mimi Syed
16:45-17:15Closing by Co-ChairsMichael Lynk
Susan Akram
17:15-18:00Closing RemarksRaji Sourani
   
   
CHAMBER 2
 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS & WORLD ORDER 
 TUESDAY, MAY 27 
9:00-9:30Chamber 2 co-Chairs introduce proceedingsRichard Falk (online)
Craig Mokhiber (online)
9:30-10:00Panel 1: Political Realism and Contemporary Geopolitics
Political Realism Revisited and the Law of PeoplesRichard Falk (online)
Paulina Chan
10:00-11:15Panel 2: Political Economy of Genocide and Obliteration of GazaModerator:
Wesam Ahmad
Nakba, Liberation, and Decolonization Through a Political Economic Lens: from 1948 to the Gaza GenocideLara Eborno
Enforcement and the Accountability Gap: The Crime of StarvationHilal Elver (online)
Ecocidal Violence in Gaza: Is it Part of Genocide or a Separate International Crime?David Whyte (online)
Pursuing Physically Disabling Combat TacticsPenny Green
11:15-11:30Coffee break
11:30-12:15Expert Testimony
Mazin Qumsiyeh 
Sami Al Arian 
Noura Erakat (pre-recorded) – Failures of the UN 
Asmer Safi – Criminalisation of student protests 
   
12:15-14:00Lunch
14:00-15:15Panel 3: Deficiencies of the formal international normative orderModerator: Lisa Hajjar
The International System in the Age of GenocideCraig Mokhiber (online)
Looking Ahead to EnforcementPhyllis Bennis (online)
International Tribunals: The ICJ and ICCMichelle Burgis-Kasthala (online)
15:15–16:00Panel 4: GTP conception of an alternative jurisprudential legal paradigmModerator: Penny Green
Civil Society Tribunals: Meeting the Challenge of Israeli Impunity for Gaza Genocide Michelle Burgis-Kasthala (online)
Permanent Peoples TribunalGianni Tognoni
16:00-17:15Panel 5:
Activism of civil society and social movements
Moderator: Wesam Ahmad
Sumud and Self-Determination: The Enduring Legacy Against ErasureRamzy Baroud
Jewish Voices for Peace and the Ceasefire CampaignPhyllis Bennis (online)
Learning from South Africa’s Anti-Apartheid StruggleHaidar Eid (online)
17:15-17:30Break
17:30-18:30Discussion
 CHAMBER 3 
HISTORY, ETHICS & PHILOSOPHY
WEDNESDAY, MAY 28
9:00-9:30Chamber 3 co-Chairs introduce proceedingsPenny Green Cemil Aydin
9:30-10:30Panel 1: Understanding GenocideModerator: Lara Elborno
Genocide as State Crime : the importance of understanding it as a processPenny Green
Ethical Implications of the Genocide in GazaAyhan Citil
History of Ethnic Cleansing/GenocideIllan Pappe (online)
10:30-11:30Panel 2: Ideological Underpinnings – Exposing DehumanizationModerator: Cemil Aydin
Challenging the Matrix of Control/House DemolitionsJeff Halper
An Ontological Abortion of the
Enfleshed Genocidal State: The Ongoing Genocidal Nakba in Gaza
Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian (read by Penny Green)
The Unmaking of the Palestinian HomeHenrietta Zeffert
11:30-11:45Break
11:45-12:45Panel 3: Resisting GenocideModerator: Thomas MacManus
The GT ArchiveAndy Simmons
Michelle Burgis -Kasthala
Palestinian ResistanceAbed Takriti
Archaeology and the Erasure of PalestineAkram Lilja
Expert testimony: The BDS CampaignOmar Bargouti (pre-recorded)
12:45-14:00Lunch
14:00-15:00Panel 4: Ideological Underpinnings – Civilization and Weaponizing the Holocaust and Anti-Semitism
Holocaust Exceptionalism and Israel’s GenocideRaz Segal (online)
Ethnic Cleansing Through Civilisational NarrativesCemil Aydin
 The Role of the Israeli Academy in Genocide ProductionMaya Wind (pre-recorded)
15:00-16:00Media Roundtable
Peter Oborne, Jonathan Cook, Victoria Brittain,
Ezgi Basaran, Kenize Mourad
16:00-16:15Break 
   
16:15-17:00Panel 5: Cultures of ErasureModerator: Wesam Ahmad
Politics of Palestine ExceptionUssama Makdisi (online)
Zionist Culture and Genocide DenialSaree Makdisi (online)
17:00-17:30Summary of Chamber 3 ReportPenny Green Cemil Aydan
17:30-18:30Discussion of the Sarajevo Declaration
   
 DAY 4 
 THURSDAY, MAY 29 
   
09:00-10:30Srebrenica/Gaza Roundtable
10:30-11:00Coffee Break
   
11:00 – 12:00Presentation of the Sarajevo Declaration + Press Conference 
12:00-12:30Closing Remarks

.

6 Responses to “GAZA TRIBUNAL PROJECT: Opening Remarks and Sarajevo Program, May 26-29, 2025”

  1. Falk-Uncensored's avatar
    Falk-Uncensored May 28, 2025 at 1:12 am #

    Stop lying about genocide in Gaza and lies about starvation.
    Your fake news narrative only highlights your ignorance of facts.
    Stop relying on Hamas as well as criminal UN agencies for your sources.

    Long live Israel!!

    Aaron Remer
    Président

    GROUPE-ACCES communications
    Centre TESS Inc.
    Domaine De La Lumiere

    300 Rue de La Berge Du Canal
    Suite 316
    Lachine,
    (Québec)
    H8R 1H3

    +1-877-77REMER
    +1-514-591-1137

    aaron@acces.com

    http://www.acces.com
    http://www.canwisp.ca
    http://www.domainedelalumiere.com

    • pioneering5923cdb009's avatar
      pioneering5923cdb009 May 28, 2025 at 1:07 pm #

      So let international journalists into Gaza so we can learn what is really going on.

  2. pioneering5923cdb009's avatar
    pioneering5923cdb009 May 28, 2025 at 12:56 pm #

    I would urge families of Gaza victims to look into the possibilities of suing Israel for wrongful death or injury–either individually or in class action. Israel is especially liable for cases of intentional and reckless killing of civilians in violation of laws of war, such as: direct attacks on civilian persons and buildings (incl. hospitals); bombings that kill disproportionate numbers of civilians; blocking humanitarian aid in violation of basic laws of siege warfare, etc.

    –Don E. Scheid

  3. drhabibsiddiqui's avatar
    drhabibsiddiqui May 29, 2025 at 8:45 am #

    I am not surprised reading the nasty comments from a pro-Israeli hawk like Aaron Remer who has no moral bites into condoning or more accurately endorsing genocide of the Palestinian people. Such depraved mentality shared widely inside Israel and by their endorsers outside has shown the real color of the ‘only democracy’ in the Middle East who boasts of having a ‘moral army’!

    Israel and the Zionist project has always been racist and genocidal from its first day of illegitimate birth. Ethnic cleansing and genocide of the indigenous Palestinians thus came easy and justifiable to these monsters and their supporters both inside and outside the bastard state of Israel.

    And the sad part is there are many westerners who continue to believe in the Israeli narratives and deny genocide that is perpetrated by the state of Israel and its IDF! When will they learn and do what is needed to put these human beasts like Netanyahu & Co. behind the Hague where they truly belong?

  4. Kats Fisher's avatar
    Kats Fisher May 29, 2025 at 2:13 pm #

    Dear Professor Falk,

    I am so sorry that you have to go through this prosecution facilitated by those who deeply hate you and hate excellent Spirit that is in you.

    We all know why they have killed journalists and healthcare workers throughout this Genocide in Gaza and Palestine.

    Can you or someone close to you reach out to Mr. Jeremy Scahill and ask him for the reports and his work for the tribunals if you have not already.

    I just came across this:

    Jeremy Scahill: Shadowy Israeli-U.S. Aid Plan Is Weapon in “Netanyahu’s War of Annihilation” in Gaza – YouTube

  5. mosckerr's avatar
    mosckerr July 21, 2025 at 2:03 pm #

    Protestant “dogmatism” redresses Catholic “dogmatism”. Both tits on a boar hog useless.

    C.S. Lewis’s “The Great Divorce” – a narrative that presents a fictional journey from a gray, dreary town (representing Hell through this metaphor) to a vibrant, beautiful heaven, where the characters confront their own choices and the nature of their desires. On par with the Aslan lion metaphor which depicts the Easter resurrection from the dead story.

    The “Great Divorce” theme focuses upon pride. Many of the characters in this metaphor cling to their “sins”. A guilt trip that dates back to the apostle Pauls’ “Original Sin” narishkeit. A lot of Goyim reject the NT guilt trip ideology. The entire Xtian theology of Heaven and Hell, pie in the sky religious theological speculations. The Talmud teaches a person who speculates on matters which the Human mind cannot conceive or grasp … better that such persons’ never born.

    To make literal declarations like “All in hell want to be there”, simply perverting a children story as depicting actual reality – what complete and utter nonsense! The theological creed Xtian belief systems qualify as examples of the metaphor story of residents of hell who made conscious choices that reflect their fervent beliefs in some pie in the sky Nicene theology of the Trinity.

    Torah has no concept of “Free Will” as Calvin solemnly declared. John Calvin’s “dogma” of Free Will emphasizes the sovereignty of some undefined god. His theology promotes the notion that this undefined Universal god has predetermined who will be saved and who will be damned. This perverse dogmatism defines the key component of Reformed Protestant theology.

    However, Calvin did acknowledge the concept of human responsibility and moral choice within the framework of his Universal god’s sovereignty. Mighty White of him to grant his Universal god these powers; such as grace – essential for salvation.

    Interesting – Moshe’s Torah and the Oral Torah-Talmud defines the middah of grace as the dedication – through swearing a Torah oath – of some unspecified tohor middah, as the k’vanna of the tohor midda of Grace. For example the tohor middah of mercy which learns from the commandment to obliterate every man woman and child of Canaan, or to the commandment to slaughter the youth – stubborn and rebellious son, or the commandment to make eternal war upon the assimilated mix multitude of Jews who lack fear of Elohim, known as Amalek. Commonly known today as antisemitism etc. Clearly Calvin’s Protestant dogmatism, like Catholic dogmatism, upon this foundation stands the theology espoused by C.S. Lewis likewise rejects Oral Torah common law precedents, some of which – listed above, as the means to interpret the k’vanna of both tohor middot of grace and mercy!

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.