World Order After 1945, After Vietnam War, and After Second Coming of Trump

6 Responses to “World Order After 1945, After Vietnam War, and After Second Coming of Trump”

1. 

   Kata Fisher February 3, 2026 at 11:25 pm #

   Dear Professor Falk,

   What they did to Ali / Eli Cohen and his Family – they most likely did exactly the same thing to Epstein. They most likely forced him to do similar / same things as Ali / Eli Cohen. I saw documentary about him / Eli. Epstein most likely got his beginnings from the Maxwells father, and that whole thing that was taking place is not in the capacity of a single person like him, or Ms. Maxwell — they were most likely doing same things as Eli Cohen – Wikipedia

   The whole thing is a sad story that shows just how incompetent and inhuman some of those people are in diabolical intellect and ingenuity, especially with Epstein case.

   They either try to kill or compromise the heads of the state. The heads of the states should not come to NY – UN, at all, for meetings, or gathering — and they should do the whole gathering elsewhere. I doubt that they will be safe and not compromised in some way.

   They will be always illegally targeted, in some way. They do not see or understand all grave dangers to them, and their governance.

   It is important to keep them safe in these diabolical circumstances.  I do not believe that they should be coming to NY/ UN gatherings, at all. As long as these current situations are going on – they all need to only commit to must necessary things, and only there where they will not be compromised, harassed.

   Are there alternative places elsewhere that can replace NY/ UN gatherings and those be moved from US, for the time being?

   That is for the sake of the Head of the States, and their custodianship safeguarding.

   I also feel terrible for Israelis that they are in grave issues that they were and are, right now. It is a terrible thing — I doubt that they can be helped in any meaningful way.

   K. F.

   Reply
   • 

     Richard Falk February 5, 2026 at 10:26 am #

     Poignant and informed in your special way. Thanks Kata for sharing your
     understanding. Warmly, Richard

     Reply
2. 

   mosckerr February 4, 2026 at 3:47 am #

   A Classic example of how the heart and soul of Torah gets lost in Goyim tits on a boar hog translations.

   “There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem…” In Acts 5:16, the Greek phrase perix tō Ierousalēm simply refers to, nearby towns, surrounding villages, local communities in Judea — a geographical description of the region immediately around Jerusalem in the early 1st Century. No manuscript—Greek, Latin, Syriac, Coptic, or otherwise—contains anything resembling “Fort Worth” in Acts 5:16.

   The phrase “round about unto Jerusalem” simply means the towns and villages surrounding Jerusalem in the 1st century. Fort Worth founded in 1849, almost 1,800 years after Acts was written. The Book of Acts written before any of the gospels were ever penned.

   There is no ancient place named Fort Worth anywhere in Judea, Samaria, or the Roman Empire. The Book of Acts written before any of the 4 gospel Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion “counterfeits”. That the church fathers organized their NT fraud with the gospel followed by Acts as corrupt as Fort Worth!

   The earliest gospel of Mark written in Rome, perhaps prior to the destruction of Herod’s temple abomination. One Roman guard famously quoted as saying, “Its better to be Herod’s dog than a family member!”

   If the Book of Acts was written in 62 CE then it predates any gospel of Mark “speculation”. Gossip narratives and speculation do not replace eye witness first hand information. Hence debates upon the NT as “historical” evidence as false as a mad hatter. Historians have no clear evidence one way or the other. Such a debate clearly separates the emphasis of the T’NaCH Jewish literature vs. the Xtian NT literature. Prophets command mussar they to not teach history. The NT fraud requires a physical historical man JeZeus. Otherwise this fraud religion collapses like a house of cards.

   Acts ends with Paul alive. No mention of Paul’s death. No mention of the Temple’s destruction. Therefore Acts was written before 70 CE, possibly around 62 CE. But all this 2000+ years later speculation fails to address the main point. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. Rava for example teaches that Job existed as a fictional imaginary man. The point of the Book of Job, to teach the mussar of g’lut and redemption from g’lut. This places the Book of Job on par and similar to the Book of Sh’mot – the 2nd Book of the Written Torah. The attempts by “scholars” thousands of years after the fact to argue that Mark preceded Acts – simply Pie in the Sky speculative nonsense.

   The merit behind interpreting the NT as the equivalent of the Russian secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander employed to justify the pogroms of the late 19th Century …

   Just as similar speculation that Paul served as an Agent Provacateur of Rabban Gamliel of the Great Sanhedrin. Jews in Judea and Alexandria Egypt locked in brutal and bitter war. Alexandria with its huge library burnt to the ground prior to the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination.

   Why the reference ‘Temple abomination’? Starting with the avoda zara of king Shlomo who first built the Temple abomination of avoda zara. The prophet Natan forbade king David to copy how Goyim civilizations worshipped their Gods. Just as Rehovoam ignored the advice of Shlomo’s advisors, so too Shlomo ignored the council of the prophet Natan. The Beit HaMikdash not a building of wood and stone idolatry but rather the establishment of the Federal Sanhedrin common law legal court system!

   T’NaCH “wisdom” literature serves to “understand” Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. The historical Books of Kings, a prophetic work, does not teach theology (the Xtian interpretation) but rather it give a big picture contexts to the Books of the Prophets! This qualifies as כלל פרט according to the middot of rabbi Yishmael. Mussar does not mean “ethical instruction”. The latter an entirely false parameter of prophesy. Mussar defines the k’vanna of the 13 tohor middot Oral Torah revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews translated the revelation of the Spirit Name who fills the Yatzir Ha’Tov heart – the נמשל of the Mishkan משל.

   The church fathers read the Book of Sh’mot as history rather than as prophetic mussar. The Torah speaks in the language of Man, it instructs mussar through משל\נמשל model/paradigm. The Creation story of the Universe instructs through this משל of 6 days time, to teach the mussar נמשל of time-oriented commandments wherein “time” understood as “wisdom” – משל\נמשל.

   Hence the church Old Testament New Testament propaganda falsely conceals the open fact that the literature of the T’NaCH radically different from the revisionist history propaganda of the letters of Paul and the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander forgery. Both Paul introduced in Acts served as an Agent Provacateur to undermine the false messiah Roman propaganda of Mark’s JeZeus. Paul by declaring brit melah as a void Torah commandment undermined the influence of the Roman false messiah gospel narrative prior to the outbreak of the great Jewish revolt in 66 CE. Paul traveled to Rome to inject a form of monotheism into Roman polytheistic society. With the purpose to undermind the foundations of Roman civilization; to crack the “Ethical Containment Force” of Roman soceity.

   Paul’s propaganda aimed to promote Civil War in Rome based upon Yehuda Maccabee’s propaganda which publicly declared Judea’s loyalty to the “real” king of the Syrian Greek empire! This Pauline propaganda based upon the generic כלל: “If it aint broke don’t fix it.” Obviously this modern rendition seeks to emphasize that Torah as a common law precedent based legal system shaped how ancient Jewish civilizations revolted against the Syrian Greek and Roman empires.

   The scholarship of ancient texts has nothing to do with a Greek Athens democratic model. The revelation of the Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic sh’itta starkly contrasts with ancient Greek philosoplers, specifically Plato and Aristotle’s deductive logic of static reasoning. פרדס logic a fluid logic similar to Calculus varables. Whereas Greek logic deductive & static, similar to Euclid’s plane geometry.
   ___________________________________
   If the T’NaCH, most essentially mussar and not history, what—if anything—do you think gets “lost in the translation”, similar to Fort Worth – when Conservative, Reform Judaism start defending T’NaCH on historical or archaeological grounds, instead of on its power as prophetic mussar?
   _______________________________________________
   This question delves straight into the Rambam Civil War? During the Dark Ages, the roads built by the Roman empire had totally collapsed. People stopped traveling distances due to the risks of being attacked and murdered. Interstate commerce totally collapsed. Jewish communities scattered across the face of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, how could they maintain some type of standardized culture and customs which would prevent Jews from assimilating to the dominant cultures and customs of the peoples wherein they lived as a despised refugee minority populaiton which had no rights???

   Scholars starting with the B’HaG and Rif organized Talmudic common law into something new and all together different than what the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud originally envisioned. Originally the T’NaCH organized mussar middot into a Common law, precedent based, middot system which compared one NaCH sugya to similar NaCH sugyot which contained the identical set of Oral Torah middot. By aligning two or more sugyot which had the same set of Oral Torah middot (‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו), this comparison of sugyot called דרוש; this alignment of similar (precedent based middot) served as something like the rear and front sights of a rifle which permitted the “sniper” to kill a target down range.

   This “kill” משל has the “k’vanna” נמשל. Hence the later Talmud based upon the משל of a loom which has opposing warp vs. weft threads. The k’vanna of the Framers of the Talmud, to create a literature of Great Sanhedrin judical court room rulings (the Mishna) together with its prosecution and defense attorney precedent debates (the Gemara). Therefore the Framers of the Talmud wrote this ancient text to serve as the judicial model for the future time when Jews would slaughter the Roman occupiers of Judea and re-establish Jewish National Independence like as occurred in 1948 and again in 1967 CE.

   Do Jews feel anger for Xtian and Muslim war crimes perpetrated against low hanging Jewish refugee easy victims. Jews no different than any other Human being abused by tyrrants. But the bottom line for the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmudic literature, not to promote Jewish anger and hatred against our oppressor cruel Par’o like enemies; any more than the Book of Sh’mot promotes anger and hatred against the Egyptians! In point of fact the Torah directly commands a negative commandment which forbids Israel to hate either specifically Egyptians and Esau in general. Esau the metaphor for Xtian Europeans.
   ____________________________________
   What gets lost when Jews defend Tanakh as history instead of prophetic mussar?
   The substance of allTanakh literature: to create an oath brit alliance which obligates all generations of Israel to dedicate tohor middot in how we interact and exchange with our people; middot-driven, common-law consciousness that “understands” time as wisdom – most specifically as time-oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar\interpretations of the k’vanna of tohor Oral Torah middot. And g’lut-exile interpreted through משל/נמשל – blessing/curse Torah oath brit. And not through the lens of Greek proof or Xtian biography revisionist history or substitute theology NT or Koran Gods.

   The day and night difference which for ever separates the Hebrew T’NaCH from either the Xtian NT or Arab Koran – translating poetry into prose — keeps the words, buth the rhythm, the soul, the imperative to “understand” (like from like distinctions) through mussar prophetic tohor middot – lost in the sophomoric translations. Gone, like Fort Worth in Acts.

   Reply
   • 

     Kata Fisher February 6, 2026 at 11:19 pm #

     Dear Professor Falk,

     Always

     A thinly little Note:

     They never had intentions to write A New Testament, – or the Gospels, as we call/ know them today.

     Luke wrote a lengthy trustworthy letter to trustworthy Theophilus (in essence), and he would have been in Fulfilment of the Promise, receiving life-giving Spirit.  

     So, too, with Paul.

     Letters were written by Paul to the Churches, or dictations to the writers who helped Paul write the letters to the Churches.  They are Pauline writings that have been lost to the Church – or have been hidden most likely (by the Latine/ West Church), if so.   Church in Corinth turned especially corrupt, and they themselves may have had destroyed Pauline writings that they did not like after their leadership withered away, and all had remained of them were cults or sects – due to the Corinthians in abuse of the Ancient Order while Paul was alive, and wrote the letters to them to correct that, and after Paul.

     Both Paul and Luke give reference to the Church in Jerusalem, whom they have received everything from.

     Then passing on of that continuation.

     Luke for example has intentions to help Theophilus understand what has been achieved among them.  In Paul’s case, it is the “Good News” (his message) that he has received directly from the Church in Jerusalem, and somewhat immediately after, or parallel to Paul’s vision in Damascus.

     First and Second Generation of the Church / the Way, and or Christian’s sects wrote the letters to each other. Church and the Sects wrote the Letters to each other.  

     They have been considering to be in fulfilment and continuation of the Old Testament.

      The critics saw them as Jewish sects, originally, even at their time.

     The authenticity and accuracy of the ancient writings were 100% since any falsification (by dictations and/or translations) in Roman Empire was accounting to the death penalty.

     They wrote letters, and they wrote those letters in their (to us now a historical context), period.

     To this point in time, the main key is to understand the Ancient Writers, what they were writing, and in their historical context in which they were writing and living.

     The main issue was (and still is to prove?)  whether something was fulfilled and was being fulfilled among them – or not.

     Where are they all fraud? How many possibly could be fraud in that time and age – with their claims that something among them was fulfilled, and is being fulfilled, all together?

     Even Luke mentions his carful investigations of the events, and they only Credited validity to the Church in Jerusalem, even in their time and age. Luke certainly did, and so did Paul.

     Then with that – somewhat it becomes the second issue, the issue of their validity/trustworthiness of the writers (themselves and all other that were circling around in Lukes and Paul’s Time) , AND/OR the issue of the preservation of their letters (writing, rewriting, hiding, destroying parts of the letters – or entire letters, all together).  

     Another factor for contemporary people to consider:  Ancient, they all fled prosecutions and things were confiscated from them – they fled on foot with whatever they could have, and with whatever they could hide, AND whatever they could save.

     So, may they have, or may they not have the letters written on one, or several parchments.  What remained together, what was lost/destroyed and/or hidden by the generations / years that followed?

     John while on Patmos – in his case of writings down – was told that nothing can be added or taken away from that what he received by the Spirit (as the Church). This part of the Church writings is prophetic in Nature.

     With that,

     Those letters. All of the Letters / writings — That history. They’re and the entire human continuation/s from their time to this one is human reality.

     I used many contemporary terms.

     So, grave abuses of what was fulfilled among them, has been received by them, and how was preserved and passed down by everyone else.

     Human nature:

     When could they ever understand the writer/s? Their own and others?

     Or when could they ever receive the Letters of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Letters? 

     And why, and why not? Obviously, they were braking Spiritual Laws with all Powerplays and dramas that they worshiped above anything else, even in that day.

     Examples such as Drusilla “Emesa,” who was involved with Felix, and Herodias and her offspring, raise further questions about the influence of historical figures on us, and their persistence of wickedness in OUR human history?

     Two spectacular set of tits – just for an example to our human history?

     Maybe not

     Drusilla “Emesa” – who most likely seduced Felix, or was seduced by Felix mast likely — and his third wife

     Maybe not

     Who was Herodias in the Bible?  And why her and her offspring were gravely wicked? That those femen were not wicked is definitely questionable.

     Seriously,

     and seriously,

     when could they ever receive the Letters of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Letters? 

     Do they understand their Writers in their own Time, and do they understand everyone else’s writers in their own times.

     Do they understand what they are doing in their own time? What a bizarrely evil thing that they all have committed and done. It is human reality that ca be observed — and noted, with or without consequence.

     Where is their Priest, the Prophet and King? What is going on?

     House of Israel is never house of David, and never will be – without David Himself, at all.

     David took his own sin and dope of curse upon himself, so that house and that offspring is free from it — but the curse and rebellion remained with obnoxious lay-people who could not repent among themselves, and in their own spirit.

     Since Ancient People and Ancient Spirit much has not changed, at all.

     K. F.

     Reply
     • 

       mosckerr February 7, 2026 at 7:40 pm #

       Middot define both T’NaCH and Talmud scholarship. Middot compare to notes on a music-sheet, based upon the Shabbat public reading of the Sefer Torah.

       Middot compare to notes on a music sheet, based upon the Shabbat public reading of the Sefer Torah. The Torah and NaCH prophets learn from the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf avoda zara where assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Israelites translated the “word” אלהים as a replacement for the revelation of the שם השם לשמה.

       Meaning all other Divine Names first introduced in the Book of בראשית refer to the vision of a God in the Heavens above. The Sinai revelation changed this spirituality unto the revelation of the שם השם לשמה who lives within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen people in this Earth below just as the משל “form” of the Mishkan-Sinai revelation teaches the mussar of the נמשל “substance” that the שם השם לשמה permanently resides upon the Earth below and not the Heavens above. דכתיב: דברים ל:יב – לא בשמים היא.
3. 

   Kata Fisher February 12, 2026 at 11:33 pm #

   I understand that self-preservation is most important, and Ten Commandments along with keeping the Sabath, and all Spiritual Laws is just what self-preservation is for Cohen Chosen people to this day, as always was. Arguing against Aaronic Priesthood, and Order of that is not possible –No one can successfully argue against any of that, even to this day. That is established and we can make a note on that.

   The Glory and Grace, and the revelation did certainly descend to the Sinai trough the Spirit.

   For the sake of the Aaronic Priesthood, make us understand why the Jewish state in Historical Palestine, and nothing else?

   I as a descendant of Bosnian Arabs and/or local to the region Goyim (non-Jews) and Roman Catholic who does not attend the Church in US due to the Grave abuse of the Ancient Church Order by the Lay-clergy of the American-Protestant-Catholicism who abuse Ancient Order (and Law of the Spirit) want to understand WHY by War, and WHY NOT by Spirit

   1. Jewish state in Historical Palestine?

   1. What is the Jewish State’s and/or state of Israel’s Plan (spiritual Plan) for the entire population, Jews and Non-Jews (immigrating and emigrating legally and illegally) within the ancient territories of the Historical Palestine and/or Kingdom of Israel and Judeah? Will the spiritual sloths rule them, and or kill them?
   2. Is and /or will the Jewish State’s and/or State of Israel’s be a spiritual sloth for Jews and non-Jews just as anyone else is a spiritual sloth for their own sheep and everyone else’s sheep’s?

   My understanding is that Aaronic Priesthood never was and would not be a spiritual sloth. However, why Jewish state? Why nothing else?

   Can we understand that?

   It Is not that I do not want to understand that — I want to understand it, but in actual facts.

   Everyone will be held accountable what they do with their own and everybody else’s herds of sheeplets.

   Is or is not the Aaronic Priesthood sufficient in the Territories in question? Is it right now, and will it be sufficient for their continuation?

   What about Human continuation (of the entire population) and human Rights? Rights of the little girls in forced marriages/rapes?

   What about diabolical cults and sects?

   Can everybody co-exist, and how?

   By inserting some civil-ecclesiastical laws? But which one? And/or Lawfully – or unlawfully?

   These are some difficult questions.

   K.F.

   Reply