[Prefatory Note: My Responses to An Egyptian Journalist, Muhamed Abd Elaziz 15 Qs on International Law, Gaza, Personal Experience, and many other topics. My most comprehensive interview on current international maladies, 2/20/2026}
——————————–
1- Throughout your long career in international law, what was the moment when you felt your work made a real difference?
It is hard to say what qualifies as ‘a real difference.’ In my opposition to the Vietnam War as a scholar of international law I think that I made some difference in the public discourse, especially after years of unexpected resistance by the Vietnamese people inspired by their charismatic leader, Ho Chi Minh. On my return to the USA from my first of two wartime visits to North Vietnam in 1968, I conveyed to the US Government peace proposals more favorable to US interests than what was negotiated by Henry Kissinger several years later. The media gave my trip and proposals prominent attention.
Similarly with respect to the Iranian Revolution of 1978-79 that brought the Islamic Republic of Iran into power, especially as a result of media quotations of my generally supportive opinion of the popularity and legitimacy of the anti-Shah movement.
After I became active in promoting solidarity with the Palestinian struggle for their basic rights my views were excluded from mainstream thinking in the media, Congress, and even in academic circles, although it did not prevent me from being active on oppositional media platforms and among peace/justice civil society groups. My activism climaxed with an unexpected appointment by the UN Human Rights Council to be the Special Rapporteur for Occupied Palestine (2008-2014), which gave me an important venue to advance my views, although it was accompanied by defamatory campaigns to discredit my role as an independent expert reporting on Israel’s systemic violations of International Humanitarian Law and commission of Crimes Against Humanity.
I continued to write books and opinion pieces that expressed my commitment to progressive causes within the US and the world, with abiding efforts to promote denuclearization of international relations, ecological resilience, and anti-colonial/anti-imperial geopolitics, as well as the promotion of US foreign policy position more compatible with the global public good and greater sensitivity to moral imperatives.
2- Which international conflicts do you think were mishandled?
This is a big topic, and I can only give a short response. In my view the peace diplomacy in 1945 and after the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the 9/11 attacks, the Ukraine War, and the October 7 Palestinian attack on Israel’s villages close to the Gaza border were handled particularly poorly from the perspective of sustainable peace, human rights, and the pursuit of world order and global governance reform..
After 1945, the US gave up on a crucial treaty effort to rid the world of nuclear weapons, it oversaw the design of the UN in ways that kept the management of global security under the control of geopolitics rather than Rule of Law, and at first took a non-committal stand against European colonialism. After the Vietnam War, it failed to appreciate that in most instances the legitimacy of anti-colonial warfare prevails in wars overcoming the possession of military superiority by the colonial side and its allies. Its foreign policy elites dedicated themselves to eliminating the ‘Vietnam Syndrome’ by which public opinion in the US opposed intervention and wars fought with no perceived or convincing national security justification; it is generally believed that the Vietnam Syndrome was overcome by the rapid, casualty-light and inexpensive Iraq War of 1991.
After 1945, the Global West, led by the US was far more concerned with preparing for conflict with the Soviet Union than it was with creating a world order respectful of international law and devoted to the global public good. The result was to identify national interests with militarized geopolitics, an expensive and risky arms race, an ideological conflict between market economics and socialism, and producing internal repression of political dissent. After the Cold War, positive modifications with respect to nuclear weapons, climate change, UN reform could have been undertaken, but was effectively resisted by Kissingerian realism premised on beliefs associated with hard power historical agency,
After 9/11 the US without any consideration opted for a global war of terror rather than seeking a more stable framework resting on respect for the sovereignty of states in the Global South, a stronger UN, and cooperative frameworks for the enforcement of criminal law. Instead the US resorted to high tech tactics killing many innocent civilians, displaying no respect for territorial sovereignty in its reliance on drones, shock and awe tactics, with the goal of stricter management of security subject to US global dominance of a unipolar world order.
After the Ukraine War, rather than recourse to diplomacy and a negotiated compromise, to which Russia was receptive, the US-NATO led response chose to wage a geopolitical war against Moscow at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Now four years later the various parties seem unwilling to negotiate in good faith, allowing the killing to continue. It seems likely the war will end as it might have four years earlier by an exchange of negotiated concessions and security reassurances.
After the October 7 attack on Israel launched from Gaza, Israel initiateded a genocidal assault with the backing of leading Western countries, with spillovers to the West Bank and region. The genocidal strikes continued killing at least 80,000 Palestinians and were implicitly linked to the Israeli quest for ‘Greater Israel’ that called for the erasure of any Palestinian resistance, either by ethnic cleansing or total victimization. The nature of the alignments on either side of this conflict exposed the Islamophobic reflex of the leading Western liberal democracies and the heartless quest for Jewish primacy in Israel even if meant institutionalizing a harsh version of apartheid.
3- How do you see the state of human rights internationally today?
The observance of human rights has declined in recent years, especially in the liberal democracies of the West, but also reflecting authoritarian and xenophobic trends throughout the world, and in virtually all leading sovereign states. The voluntary adherence to the norms of international law with respect to human rights has also been negatively affected by the failure to address Israeli apartheid and genocide, and the widespread repression of pro-Palestinian solidarity protests and policy initiatives. The internal curtailments of human rights in the leading liberal democracies has also set back all efforts to increase compliance with human rights legal stardards.
4- How would you assess the current role of the United Nations in resolving existing conflicts, such as those in the Middle East or Palestine?
The UN is weaker than it has ever been since ir was established in 1945. This partially the result of the UN’s inability to protect the Palestinian people, and others, from Israel’s defiance of international law, highlighted by the refusal to respect Palestinian basic rights, above all, the right of self-determination, related rights of resistance to its denial in this kind of settler colonial context, and reaction to Israeli uses of force against several neighboring countries. This has been dramatized by allowing Israel and the United States to oversee in a manipulative manner the current ceasefire arrangements and control the future of Gaza, institutionalized in the shameful Board of Peace, which rewards the perpetrators of genocide and severely punishes its victims.
5- If you could change one previous international decision, which one would it be and why?
It was the decision back in 1945 to entrust the management of global security to non-accountable geopolitical actors, accorded an exemption from a legal duty to comply with the UN Charter. A closely related decision, important symbolically and substantively, was to impose accountability for war crimes only on civilian, military, and corporate leaders of the losers in World War II, coupled with the refusal to allow legal scrutiny of the crimes of the winners. The winners were expected by the American prosecutor, Justice Jackson to adhere in the future to the standards imposed on the losers at Nuremberg but consistently failed to do so with impunity.
6- Is it possible for the Iran nuclear deal to be revived and for Iran, the US, and Israel to live in peace?
It seems doubtful so long as the US steadfastly supports Israel’s patterns of hegemonic security policies applied not only to the Palestinian people, but to neighbors that either are sympathetic with the Palestinian ordeal, most notably Iran, or are perceived by Israel’s leaders to pose future obstacles to its goals of hegemonic regionalism. Peace in the region also depends on the West giving up its ideas about prevailing in an inter-civilizational struggle between the Islamic Middle East and the Christian West, a current struggle whose deep psycho-political and economistic roots can be traced back to the Christian Crusades of earlier centuries.
For regional peace to prevail in the Middle East to six interrelated steps must be taken: self-determination for Palestine, Israeli renunciation or drastic revision of Zionist ideology seeking ‘Greater Israel’ and regional hegemony; ending all US sanctions imposed on Iran; Israel’s giving up its nuclear weapons capability coupled with a monitored treaty to make the Middle East a nuclear free zone; the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission that critically examines the various versions of the Israeli and Palestinian narratives from the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917 forward to the present; s negotiated cap on military spending and sales by Israel; a Declaration of Coexistence based on ethnic equality, and signed by both Heads of State and reinforced by a pledge of Permanent Members of the Security Council to suspend. any use of the veto in connection with any recurrences of the Israel/Palestine conflict. .
7- In your opinion, did the US and Israeli strikes succeed in destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities?
Of course, it is impossible to know with any precision, but all signs suggest that Iran has restored its enrichment facilities, which may both enhance its defensive capabilities and make it more vulnerable to further (unlawful) attacks by Israel and/or the United States. There is no justification in contemporary international law with respect to preventive war, including to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weaponry.
8- Do you think the current Iranian regime is facing an existential challenge, and how do you see the future of the Islamic Republic?
The Islamic Republic has proved remarkably successful over the decades in opposing external and internal opposition to the stability of national governance and to the protection of its rights as a sovereign state. Iran has been unfairly dealt with respecting its nuclear program, given Israel’s and the US hostility, threats, and uses of force since 1979. It is the core example of the doctrinal application of the clash of civilizations hypothesis that assumed policy relevance throughout Atlanticist region in the post-Cold War global setting. Trump’s pro-Israeli diplomacy has intensified the challenge of military attack and regime-changing interventions, but his transactualism could also lead to some kind of pragmatic agreements that would include a long-deferred normalization of relations with the Islamic Republic. Trump’s brand of narcissistic geopolitics includes a willingness to make abrupt and unexpected policy shifts.
9- Did the IAEA play a secret role in revealing the uranium enrichment levels to Israel and the US?
It seems the IAEA was the victim of Western geopolitical manipulations, but it is difficult to set forth reliably the fully story without access to the classified inner activity that led to these irresponsible IAEA reports on the restoration of Iranian enrichment capabilities.
10- What do “ICC” and “ICJ” need to have stronger enforcement mechanisms?
The ICJ to be stronger at the stage of enforcement would benefit from a curtailment of the P5 right of veto in all instances where the issue is one of ICJ enforcement. The GA could also urge compliance or even the imposition of sanctions, not with the force of a legal obligation, but as a moral duty.
The ICC, which unlike the ICJ, is not part of the UN System and relies on the treaty framework of the Rome Statute for its operations has currently no means of enforcement beyond the voluntary compliance of non-parties, which include the three leading geopolitical actors of our time, Russia, China, and the United States. A strong GA resolution might produce various kinds of pushback by sovereign governments and civil society actors that could increase pressure for both compliance and success. An alternative would be a UN Charter amendment giving the GA authority to enforce the judgments of both international tribunals. Such an innovation would depend on the P5 to recommend unanimously that such an amendment be adopted..
In the end, the political will of major states would be decisive in many instances, either to induce compliance or to support non-compliance. At present, most governments are resistant to obligations that encroach on national sovereignty, but in this setting of enforcing ICJ (including Advisory Opinions) and ICC decisions have a greater formal claim if the state in question is a member of the UN or a party to the Rome Statute.
11- Did Israel try to win you over to its side during your time as the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Palestine?
No, they made no attempt after losing their opposition to my appointment as Special Rapporteur at the Human Rights Council. Their entire effort during the six years I served as an unpaid UN appointee was to discredit me as an objective observer, accusing me of ethnic bias in repeated defamatory smears. Sadly, the UN exhibited little support even when I was detained in an Israeli airport prison facility while on a UN mission seemingly responsive to inflammatory comments from UN Watch, an NGO that devotes its energies and resources to the aggressive and often unscrupulous defense of Israel against critics, resorting to lies and insults. It is a sign of UN weakness that UNW is neither disciplined in its behavior or more appropriately delisted by the UNOSOC as possessing UN representational credentials.
12- How do you see the changes in Gaza and the entire Middle East since 7 October?
Although the future is unknowable, especially given a variety of factors, and hopeful possibilities should not be excluded from the political imagination although the present circumstances make the near future looks dark from perspectives that favor constructive responses to Palestinian grievances, greatly aggravated by Israel’s recourse to genocide for more than two years, flagrantly violating the Genocide Convention. The entire world witnessed in real time the horrifying daily images of the cruelty of the genocide, as well as Israel’s defiant posture, and the shocking civilizational support Israel received from the white Christian world on the first few months after October 7. At the same time, Trump is mercurial leader capable of making abrupt changes in the US role, already somewhat evident clinging to a two-state solution contrary to Israel’s wishes, although vaguely promised, and then only to be realized at some distant point in the future. It does appear to counter Israel’s present drive to establish Greater Israel as soon as possible. However, such a pledge is not without its contradictions. These are mainly shown by the absence of US criticism of Israel’s indulgence, if not encouragement of settler violence in the West Bank, an approach more consistent with de facto annexation than of any serious effort to demand that Israel policies meet the preconditions for establishing a viable Palestinian state. At present, without even the courtesies of deception, Israel seems more determined than ever to make any form of Palestinian statehood less and less feasible or desirable.
Besides this, Israel and the US pay no attention to the 2024 ICJ Advisory Opinion clearly obligating to withdraw from all three Occupied Palestinian Territories, a judicial outcome endorsed overwhelmingly by a GA resolution.
.
13- Do you see President Trump’s plan as an American occupation of Gaza?
It is a somewhat original joint colonizing vision to be implemented by a multi-state ‘Board of Peace, advantageous for Israel, punitive for the Palestinians, and under the uncontested partisan leadership of Donald Trump. It is in my view a disgrace that the UN Security Council unanimously endorsed the Trump Plan in SC Res 1803, which is a symbolic vindication of Israel’s genocide and a further punitive framework for the indefinite subjugation of Palestinians to a blend of ethnic cleansing and a harsh version of apartheid. Whether the outrageous Trump idea of supervising the reconstruction of Gaza to be the Riviera of the Middle East is situated somewhere on a policy spectrum linking predatory disaster capitalism to imperial geopolitics, and hopefully it is the imperial fantasy of a displaced realtor, and like many such flights of fancy, never to be realized. .
14- During your meeting with Ayatollah Khomeini, what exactly took place between you? How would you describe the impact of that encounter on you?
In Jannuary 1979 I was accompanied by Ramsey Clark, former US Attorney General, and Donald Luce, an anti-war religious leader, accepting an invitation from Mehdi Bazargan, the Interim President of the Islamic Republic, asking me to form a small delegation to visit Iran so as to have direct contact with the revolution and its leaders during the climactic days that were on the verge of producing victory for the popular movement of opposition to the Shah. During our time in Iran the Shah abdicated as his downfall as Iran’s leader became the only unfinished business of the victorious revolution. It was a perfect moment to have this conversation with symbolic leader of this revolution that surprised the world by its successful resistance to the Shah’s repressive apparatus.
While we were still in Iran, just prior to Ayatollah Khomeini’s return to Iran, we were told that because our visit was viewed as a success we were told that as a surprise reward we were being offered the opportunity to meet with Ayatollah Khomeini on our way back to the United States at his exile residence in a suburb of Paris/.
We had rhe meeting sitting in a circle within a large tent on the lawn of his residence. We covered many topic of lasting significance, but the one that remains uppermost in my memory was Ayatollah Khomeini’s initial questions to us as to whether, unlike in 1953, the United States would accept the will of the Iranian people and be open to normal diplomatic relations, which was his preferred future provided it was not a ruse to induce the new leadership to drop its guard.
We also inquired about the wellbeing of the Jewish minority, and his response was reassuring: “Judaism is an authentic religion, and if Jews do not involve themselves as agents of Israel, it would be a tragedy for us if they left Iran.” I came away from our several hours sitting on the ground in the tent with the distinct impression that Ayatollah Khomeini’s had a distinct preference for a peaceful diplomatic future with the West. Unfortunately, due to a number of factors, this has remained ‘the road not taken’ and to quote the renowned American poet, Robert Frost’s final line of the poem,.’and that has made all the difference.’
There is much else of interest that transpired at that meeting, including our impressions of this charismatic historic religious leader, but that would unduly lengthen my response, and will be saved for another occasion.
15- Why did you receive death threats for several years after your New York Times article titled “Trusting Khomeini,” and how did you deal with it?
Of course, I do not know the true motivations of those who transmitted death threats. It was more than disagreement with my assessments. I suspect it was to make me fear the consequences if I did not remain silent in the future. These threats did not alter my strong conviction that the US Government should at least test the willingness of Iran’s new leadership to act in accord with this stated desire for normal diplomatic relations based on mutual respect and shared benefits. It was an opportunity missed to demonstrate that the US was ready to grant legitimacy to the outcome of internal national struggles to shape the political identity of a sovereign state, an essential feature of the right of self-determination.
Because the road taken by all US leaders was one of confrontation and hostility toward the Islamic Republic, not in keeping with a rational assessment of US national interests,, it challenged the new leadership in Iran to give the highest priority to regime security and territorial defense. Whether these preoccupations were responsible for the harsh and seemingly intolerant policies of theocratic governance is impossible to discern. Interpreting whether the decades that followed might have been different if the US and Israel had not constantly Iranian historical anxieties about the past is a matter of pure speculatiom. Perhaps, a more convincing picture will emerge if Iranian policy insiders offer a careful analysis of how the security threats and destabilizing policies spearheaded by Israel, backed by the main members of the Atlanticist political community that emerged after World War II, turned governance into an understandable obsession with national security and regime stability.
16- Do you believe the George W. Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks? Do you possess any information that you haven’t previously published?
I am not an expert on the ongoing debates about what really happened on 9/11, but I do know that there are many loose ends and unanswered questions in the official version of the alleged Al Qaeda attacks. There is no present receptivity in Washington to opening the issue to objective scrutiny by an independent international commission of inquiry.
I have not seen any convincing evidence of active complicitly by George W. Bush beyond the well-established facts of complacency in the face of warnings of some kind of terrorist attack. The immediate launch of the Great Terror War was a regressive response, but consistent with the policy impulses of the ‘foreign policy elites’ that control the shaping of US national interests. An additional source of suspicion arose because the US was being pushed by Israel to adopt an anti-Iraq position in the Middle East. It is doubtful that the 2003 Iraq War would have been launched without the camouflage of the 9/11 attacks, which provided a falsely constructed rationale for engaging aggressively against any adversary of the United States, especially in the Middle East. It is worth revisiting ‘the clean break’ neo-con manifesto drawn up with encouragement from Israeli leaders in the 1990s.
…………………………………
##
Global Justice in the 21st Century 
Excellent article.
Excellent and superbly informative.
Greetings Richard! It is such an inspiration to me and many others, you have not given up the fight for the Law, Truth and Justice for Palestine and this World. You should take solace in that fact!
It is my view and understanding Hamas’ Operation Al Asqa Flood October 7 set this World on the Path to Armageddon, aka the great day of the Battle of God Almighty between Theocratic Israel vs Theocratic Iran with a lot of US Christian Nationalism mixed in. The unprovoked Israeli Act of War against Iran June 13 with the US joining in confirmed that view.
In retrospect, those events proved this article posted to my blog 9 years earlier, around the Time I first learned of you, proved to be prescient. https://rayjc.com/2014/11/13/temple-mount-and-the-battle-of-the-great-day-of-god-almighty/
With the MSM reporting on an imminent US-Israel attack on Iran again, over the weekend I replied to 100 + power elites on X, from The White House, Speaker Johnson, Bolton, Pompeo, Senators & House Representatives, and many other People of influence with this,
‘For everyone calling on the US to attack Iran on behalf of Israel—read this. In 2012, an Israeli reporter in The Jerusalem Post documented what your “ally” really is: A government whose spiritual leader prayed publicly for God to “wipe out” the Iranian regime—and the crowd answered “amen.”
Ministers who used racial slurs for Arabs as casually as breathing. A foreign minister so toxic other Israeli leaders had to do his job. A housing minister openly advocating segregation. A transportation minister trying to erase Arabic names from highway signs.
If this is what Israelis are being indoctrinated with, kiss Peace in the Middle East goodbye and welcome to Armageddon/WW III.
That was 14 years ago. Nothing has changed. The same spirit is in power. The same march to Armageddon continues.
You want the US to fight Israel’s war? You should know who and what you’re fighting for. https://rayjc.com/2012/08/31/ship-of-fools/
You mentioning The Balfour Declaration of ALL SOULS DAY November 2, 1917, is the perfect segue to share this article on The Balfour Declaration posted February 1 with this intro, ‘February 1 is not only the ancient day calling for Ritual Cleansing—the purging of the old to make way for the Truth—but it also marks my 51st Spiritual Birthday AD. Since I first came alive to God in 1975, I have stood as a witness while my flesh now moves through its 82nd year.
Today, the ritual is no longer a ceremony; it is a Verdict.
https://rayjc.com/2026/02/01/the-final-judgment-executing-the-fifty-year-foreclosure/
Warmest regards with Peace and Blessing,
Ray
Thanks, Ray, for your affirming words, which mean much to me considering their source!
I will try to respond more substantively to your important substantive comments as soon as
I find time.
Warm greetings,
Richard
Why Yirmiyahu 1 Cannot “Compare” to Tehillim; Eikhah and Yirmiyahu: A National Axis. T’NaCH : Talmud :: Yerushalmi : Bavli. Judicial Justice vs. Creedal Religion. Prophesy vs. “foretelling”. The metaphor of calling Eikhah “Gemara” to Yarmia “Mishna” – not historiography. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. T’NaCH Av, Talmud toladah – like בראשית introduces Av wisdom commandments\time oriented mitzvot which require k’vanna while שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר supplies Case/Rule toladot בניני אבות\precedents which require חכמה that raises halachic toladot ritualism unto Av time-oriented wisdom commandments.
Yermia 1:1–10, a mussar commissioning narrative, while the others incline toward poetic reflections (Tehillim, Iyov) or wisdom exhortation (Mishle). Different genres = different aims. Tehillim 40:1–3, Mishle 1:20–23, and Iyov 14:1–4, which explains why they don’t “compare” in any meaningful literary or theological way. Yermia 1:1–10, a mussar-prophetic prose, not poetry. Tehillim 40:1–3, a personal expression of gratitude for deliverance from suffering. It communicates this “vision” through a poetic, emotional, and liturgical language. Mishle 1:20–23, speaks as a rebuking teacher calling the simple to “remember” as the basis of t’shuva. It qualifies as instructional wisdom literature, not narrative. Iyov 14:1–4, laments the brevity and impurity of human life; existential poetry, not instruction or thanksgiving.
Tehillem 130 despite its plea for help and yearns for tohor middot revealed in this world and therefore superficially reflects the Yermia 1:1-10 theme of longing for tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov to guide and direct how a man interacts with his oath alliance Cohen people in the faith: pursuit of judicial justice – which witnesses a common law court imposed fair restitution of damages to victims. 130 differs from the mussar of the opening verse of Yermia, whose mussar applies straight across the board to all generations of the chosen people while Tehillem, specifically in this particular case, reflects a personal supplication and trust for guidance rather than defined Oral Torah tohor middot (אל רחום חנון וכו) which defines prophetic mussar in all the Books of the NaCH prophets.
Mishle 2:15 invites the generations to seek wisdom. Torah wisdom defined as מלאכה. The refinement of tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha-Tov Mishkan-heart separates לא בשמים היא from the Book of בראשית which perceived אל שדי, או אלהים, או אל in the Heavens rather than post Sinai where all prophetic mussar rebukes Israel over and again not to search for our local Sinai tribal god anywhere outside of our Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts.
Eikhah has a traditional association with Yermia – both Books express sorrow and mourning for Jerusalem’s destruction. Shir HaShirim communicates a heart felt relationship with the revelation of the שם השם לשמה through the Horev revelation of 13 tohor middot.
Yermia 1:1–10 = Prophetic Mussar for the Entire Nation not a personal prayer which separates and catagorizes all Tehillem as שבח rather than ברכות. A Torah blessing requires שם ומלכות the essential conditions required to swear any & all Torah oath alliances known as “brit/britot”. This an absolutely critical מאי נפקא מינא definition of the 7th tohor Oral Torah midda רב חסד. The revelation at Horev of the 13 tohor middot define the required k’vanna of any and all wisdom commandments from the Torah known collectively as “time-oriented commandments”.
Therefore which Holy Writing Primary “Gemara” source surpasses in tohor middot depth comparison to Yermia 1:10/”Mishna”? Eikhah. Due to it expresses national, not personal, the brit faith of blessing/curse justice – the central theme of acceptance of the Torah at Sinai as defined by the first Sinai commandment. HaShem libertated Israel from Egyptian slavery for Israel to obey the oath brit to rule Canaan with judicial common law Sanhedrin courtroom justice. Eikha communicates the curse of g’lut prophetic mussar; it functions as the case law to Yermia’s legal themes.
Eikha addresses the consequences of worshipping Av tuma avoda Gods Universal Monotheism or otherwise who live in the Heavens above and therein denies and rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; the revelation of the post Calf 13 middot defines the Torah concept of רוח הקודש. No other Ketuvim textual sources surpass how Eikhah serves as the Case/Rule best בנין אב precedent for Yermia 1:1-10.
Jewish tradition, as reflected in Bava Batra 15a and various Targumim, links Eikhah to Jeremiah, sometimes viewing the five poems as his emotional outpouring following the consequences of the Moshe oath brit alliance cut in the Book of D’varim. Prophets do NOT foretell the future as defines the tuma nature of witchcraft from the Torah and also expressed through the av tuma gospels declarations “fulfilled the words of the prophets”.
Psalm 130, while yearning for redemption and tohor qualities, remains a personal plea (“Out of the depths I call to You”), differing from the transgenerational prophetic mussar in Yarmia. Certain approaches emphasize the 13 tohor middot (revealed at Horev post-Golden Calf) as defining prophetic mussar and Oral Torah logic, distinguishing heart-centered covenantal wisdom (“לא בשמים היא”) from external searches. Within such lenses, Eikhah functions as a national “case” illustrating blessing/curse dynamics tied to Sinai acceptance, serving as precedent for Yarmia 1:1-10’s themes.
This view draws on traditional associations while advancing a specialized framework centered on the 13 tohor middot as the logic system of Oral Torah revelation, the Yatzir Ha-Tov as the internal Mishkan-heart locus of wisdom (מלאכה), and time-oriented commandments requiring k’vanna defined by these middot (e.g., the single simplified example of רב חסד linked to oath alliances with שם ומלכות).
Eikhah portrays the events as the national outworking of ignored prophetic warnings, functioning as emotional “case” material to Yarmia’s legal-prophetic mussar themes of judicial common law, fair restitution, Sanhedrin courtroom rule in Canaan as the purpose of liberation from Egyptian slavery. T’shuva spins around the central axis of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to eternally father the chosen Cohen people.
The revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot spirits defines the k’vanna of the revelation of the first Commandment שם השם לשמה – the greatest Torah commandment upon which all other Torah commandments stand or fall. Eikhah, as national lament over g’lut consequences of rejecting Sinai’s first commandment (liberation for judicial brit justice), illustrates blessing/curse dynamics and serves as paradigmatic (a paradigm, one word can be replaced by another that fulfills the same grammatical role) precedent (בנין אב) for heart-centered oath brit alliances (Based upon the pre-conditions of שם ומלכות, where the latter term restricted to the dedication of Oral Torah middot as the guide and direction of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the heart.) blessed to prevail over all av tuma avoda zara spirits – based upon the 10 plagues of Egypt.
Its an error to say that Eikhah explicitly functions as the “best case law”/”Gemara source” for the Prophetic Primary source of Yarmia 1:1-10 simply because both the Mishna and Gemara followed after the sealing of the T’NaCH early in the days of the 2nd Commonwealth. Rather then to say that the T’NaCH serves as the “av model” for the later Mishna/Gemara\Talmud; akin to the Bavli came about 150 years after the sealing of the Yerushalmi. Anachronistic – out of its proper historical or chronological context – to compare T’NaCH literature with the much later Talmudic literature, except that both this and that exist as משנה תורה common law legalism. The former mussar common law while the latter halachic ritual common law; specifically the framers of the Talmud sealed the k’vanna for this common law scholarship to serve as the model in its own right to the day when Jews reconquered our homeland from the clutches of the Goyim.
Its an error to say that Eikhah explicitly functions as the “best case law”/”Gemara source” for the Prophetic Primary source of Yarmia 1:1-10 simply because both the Mishna and Gemara followed after the sealing of the T’NaCH early in the days of the 2nd Commonwealth. Rather then to say that the T’NaCH serves as the “av model” for the later Mishna/Gemara\Talmud; akin to the Bavli came about 150 years after the sealing of the Yerushalmi. Anachronistic – out of its proper historical or chronological context – to compare T’NaCH literature with the much later Talmudic literature, except that both this and that exist as משנה תורה common law legalism. The former mussar common law while the latter halachic ritual common law; specifically the framers of the Talmud sealed the k’vanna for this common law scholarship to serve as the model in its own right to the day when Jews reconquered our homeland from the clutches of the Goyim.
Eikhah exemplifies national brit dynamics: the lived curse of g’lut stemming from av tuma worship or rejection of Sinai’s commandments against witchcraft and Yosef’s divination fraud with his brothers! The T’NaCH – sealed through a gradual process spanning the Second Temple era, with traditional credit to the Men of the Great Assembly (early Second Commonwealth) for significant organization, though full consensus extended into the early rabbinic period after Daniel’s composition (~164 BCE). The Mishnah – redacted ~200 CE; the Yerushalmi Gemara reached completion in the late 4th to early 5th century CE; the Bavli followed roughly 100–180 years later (mid-6th to early 7th century CE), if the Sovaraim included as the final redactors.
Tanach therefore stands as the primary “av model”—providing precedents via hermeneutics such as binyan av—for the Mishna/Gemara structure, exactly as the Yerushalmi models the expansive Bavli. This avoids anachronism while preserving Tanach’s primacy in defining mussar, justice, and middot refinement as the substance of Torah faith to pursue righteous justice among our people.
The Talmud compares to that of a warp/weft loom which weaves aggadic דרוד\פשט threads of T’NaCH mussar with רמז/סוד threads of halachic ritualism. This latter “thread” conceals the judicial justice most essential nature of Talmudic hope and vision for the future with the kabbalah of halacha which dresses the Talmud as religious ritual Jewish law. Av tuma avoda zara by definition worships their Gods (Monotheism or otherwise) in the Heavens above and not as faith in righteous judicial courtroom common law justice below.
Judicial justice, in point of fact, abhors religious belief systems, theologies and Creedal dictates from god-like saints and cult figures as something disgusting on par with how the brothers of Yosef groveled before him. Cults of personality practically the sole definition of avoda zara; Muhammad and his silly Koran serve as stark witness. The wisdom of weaving prophetic mussar based upon tohor prophetic middot as the k’vaana of doing halachic ritual observances changes these toldot-secondary commandments/mitzvot which do not require k’vaana to wisdom Torah commandments which dedicate – like a korban – Oral Torah tohor middot – the revelation of k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment sanctified לשמה. Simply stated: Judicial justice vs. Religious belief in God or Gods — compares to a person who enters a mikveh while holding a dead rat in his hand. This comparison taught in mesechta Yevamot expresses the deep revulsion and utter contempt for the Pauline graphted on to, Goyim don’t require brit melah, not under the law av tuma avoda zara; or the Muhammad the last prophet lie – the Torah forbids camel before pig.
Earthly Sanhedrin courtroom justice—rooted in the first Sinai commandment—as the living “mikveh” of the nation, while heavenly-focused belief systems contaminate it like the dead rat. This shabbat like הבדלה emphasizes heart-centered tohor middot refinement over creedal religion, aligns with T’NaCH prophetic mussar. The משל of holding a dead sheretz (rat), all theology based Creedal Ego-I belief systems fundamentally define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai negative commandment. The רמז\סוד threads of Talmudic halacha conceal the substance of Torah courtroom justice from the forms of religious belief in Gods in heaven or earth – the latter expressed through physical Temple-idols.
The revelation of the Torah through the רמז\סוד of the Mishkan – the sin of the Golden Calf functions as its logical דיוק/inference. The bark of a tree does not compare to the fruit it produces. Avoda zara confuses the bark for the fruit; the ערב רב did not worship a Golden Calf “bark” but rather they foolishly worshiped the word name substitute theology which replaced אלהים for the Sinai first commandment שם השם לשמה – which the Oral Torah further clarified as רוח הקודש מידדות. No word, regardless of its spoken language, can substitute or replace רוח הקודש middot Spirits – the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which all Goyim reject to this very day.
Torah prophetic mussar rebukes ערב רב Jews to this very day, like Rambam & Spinoza to this very day. The Torah curse of exile does not predict the future but rather warns of the death consequences for the Chosen Cohen people to profane their Torah oath alliance. Mesechta Sanhedrin learns the cause of the floods of Noach to false oaths.
Traditions that billions of people hold sacred compares to the argument: If Joe jumps off the roof and breaks his leg, does that mean that you too must jump off the roof and break your neck? Slander defines Xtian & Muslim religious propaganda. Both pervert Torah monolatry replaced by metaphysical monotheism. Sinai not some universal metaphysical dictate of ultimate reality. Rather simply the revelation of judicial courtroom justice as the Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms in the conquered lands of Canaan.
The transmission of “Divine knowledge” does not predict the future but rather the blessing/curse Torah oath established by Moshe on the last day before he passed. Prophetic mussar as understood by mesechta Sanhedrin addresses prophesy as Torah consequences which Moshe called Life or Death. Later Dark Ages & Medieval philosophical interpretations expose Jewish avoda zara wherein the Jewish ערב רב blew out the Hanukkah likes on par with the Tzeddukim, and Karaim heretics. Rambam’s Guide II:1 profanes the Mishna ruling which instructs the mussar against Israel attempting to grasp: “that which exists above, below, or behind them! Better that Rambam never even born.
Later Reshonim scholars such as French common law school founder Rashi who interpreted Daniel as not a prophet and later ‘a prophet’. This latter contradiction does not “replace” the simple fact that the Book of Daniel organized in the Holy Writings rather than the Prophetic Books of the T’NaCH. Post sealing of the Sha’s, secondary sources cannot permanently equal or replaces sealed Masoret Primary Sources. This key Torah halacha serves as the basis for the sealing of the T’NaCH, Mishna, Gemara, and Siddur in the first place.
Torah judicial justice emphatically validates different perspectives of eye-witness testimony. Post sealing of the Sha’s Bavli sealed an equal masoret to all generations. Post sealing of the Sha’s commentator – secondary sources must base their legal opinions upon sealed masoret traditions. For example: Did king Shlomo initiate his avoda zara by building the Temple rather than establishing the Sanhedrin Federal Court system/Beit HaMikdash? Based upon the mussar of the prophet Natan to David, the failure of David in the matter of Bat Sheva defines the sanctification dedication of the prophet Shmuel’s anointing David as Moshiach. This later prophetic Book based upon Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach.
Consolation prophecies, known in Hebrew as nechama, refer to mussar prophecies found in the Hebrew T’NaCH which offer comfort and hope, particularly following loss or suffering. These prophecies often deal with themes of redemption, restoration, and divine consolation following Torah curses raining down upon Israel due to our assimilation and intermarriage violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment.
דברים ד:לט: ה’ הוא האלוהים בשמים ממעל ועל הארץ מתחת — אין עוד
תהילים צו:ה — כי כל אלוהי העמים אלילים, וה’ עשה את השמים
These two T’NaCH sources do not contradict nor invalidate the tribal deity of Sinai. The vision of the Avot perceived אל שדי, אלהים, אל as the oath brit God of the Heavens. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai לא בשמים היא, this revelation which only the 12 Tribes of Israel accept to this day, rabbi Yechuda HaNassi explained in his chiddush reading of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם as the expression of the Oral Torah tohor 13 middot spirits living within the Yatzir Ha’Tov bnai brit heart. Clearly this interpretation does not deny the reality that HaShem rules both the Heavens and the Earth. Rather it emphasizes that the revelation of the Torah at Sinai restricts Torah common law to Sanhedrin courts within the borders of the oath sworn lands alone. Just as Israel “alone” accepted the revelation of the Torah common law legal system as the definition of Torah faith. Clearly Goyim who reject the Torah perceive, as their right, their Gods in the heavens above. No different than as learned in the pre-Sinai Book of בראשית.
A public WordPress blog posting – The Gospel of Isaiah serves as proof of just how corrupt and post Shoah insane church propaganda. Its ‘good news’ perverts T’NaCH literature which predates the rise of Xtianity by almost 1000 years; a huge gap separates Yehoshua’s invasion of Canaan from Paul’s ‘not under the law’. Muhammad’s Koran compares to Martin Luther’s attempt to convert the Jews to Lutheranism, which later made open alliance with Hitler’s Shoah campaign.
The first Torah commandment has nothing to do with history. Impossible to physically prove the physical location of Sinai! Therefore the Torah revelation does not teach history, but rather prophetic mussar. Neither the NT nor the later Koran accepted this Torah concept of prophesy restricted to mussar applicable to the Jewish inheritors of the Sinai oath brit faith which commands – conquer Canaan and rule that inheritance with judicial courtroom common law justice. Post Shoah exiled church and mosque, have to address the collapse of Arab lands which far surpasses the First Crusade temporary defeat. An Independent Israel followed up by an Independent Kurdistan radically changes the domination of the Koran theology across the Middle East and North Africa. While post Shoah Church has yet to address its long bloody history of guilt and war crimes: “By their fruits you shall know them”.
NaCH prophets obey Moshe, prophets command mussar they do not foretell the future, like as did Yosef who mocked his brothers. NT av tuma avoda zarah “fulfill the words of the prophets” the definition of witchcraft and divination by viewing the future as seen through a crystal ball. The mention of Cyrus in Isaiah 45 raises important questions about prophetic interpretation, particularly within the framework of Jewish tradition. While one could misinterpret this as fortune-telling or divination, obviously such an assumption directly violates the Torah of Moshe Rabbeinu. The prophesy of Isaiah 45 which refers to Isaiah as Moshiach clearly not a literal interpretation of the Oral Torah commandment of Moshiach which learns from Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach and Mesechta Sanhedrin which refers to Pinchas as משיח מלחמה.
The mussar of the prophet clearly compares to Yarmia’s Book of Kings satire which refers to king Shlomo as the wisest of all men. Isaiah’s mocking of idols carved from wood, likewise mussar satire which mocks ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews who worship golden calves throughout the generations and bring the Torah curse of Amalek upon all generations of Jews who break the Torah oath with forever separates by creating the chosen Cohen people through the wisdom commandments known as time-oriented commandments.
Saadia Gaon preceded the later Spanish Reshon Rambam, both assimilated Jews who embraced the rediscovered ancient Greek philosophies. They duplicated the error remembered through the mitzva of Hanukkah, about a Century before the arrival of the NT new Universal God. Originally, the Shimronim, converts for fear of lions, set the stage for later assimilated Tzeddukim sons of Aaron. The latter ערב רב, fought a Civil War against the P’rushim. These רשעים embraced Greek philosophy and syllogism deductive logic and forgot Oral Torah inductive logic as taught by both the P’rushim and later by rabbi Akiva’s פרדס reasoning – the definition of the Oral Torah middot revelation of the 1st Sinai שם השם. The Mishna and Gemara sages interpreted both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law literature based upon לא בשמים היא central revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Interpreted as the tohor middot revelation of the Sinai first commandment Spirit Name dwells within the Yatzir Ha-Tov Mishkan משל.
The oath brit sworn alliance cut with the Avot, the New Testament/Old Testament bible falsifies; the latter false prophesy salvation from sin – fulfillment of NT JeZeus God replacement theology for the “OT” – Canaan land inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed, replaced by this ‘son of God’ unoriginal Greek mythology of Hercules. The Torah משל of Creation introduces wisdom commandments known collectively as time-oriented mitzvot; not any טיפש פשט that HaShem created the Universe in 6 days. The sin of the Golden Calf prophetic mussar serves to define avoda zara for all future born generations.
Xtian and Arab/Muslim versions of their differing versons of some Universal Monotheistic God violates both the 1st & 2nd Sinai commandments just as dunking the head of a new born baby into water till it drowns amounts to first degree murder. Neither Esau nor Yishmael accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence, since only the 12 tribes of Israel accept the Torah revelation, therefore the god of Israel a local tribal god. The notion promoted by both church & mosque of a Universal Monotheistic God masks the reality that Monotheism masks & conceals the fact that both religions of avoda zara worship other strange alien Gods which the revelation of the Sin of the Golden Calf defines for all generations. Universalized theological abstraction simply another kind of calf.
The church propaganda which promotes JeZeus as God and mosque propaganda which promotes Allah as God – both amount to an exact duplication of the sin of the Golden Calf. Avoda zara not a actual golden calf – this metaphor alludes to the error of translating words which attempt to equivocate to Divine Spirits. Just as nothing in the Earth, Seas, or Heavens compares to the revelation of HaShem (first Sinai commandment) so too and how much more so word translations such as JeZeus or Allah as the definition of some theological Monotheistic creedal belief system!
The Torah does not deny the existence of other divine beings; it denies their legitimacy for Israel who alone accepts the Torah Sinai revelation. Both Xtianity and Islam universalize the god of Israel, reinterpret the prophets as predictors, or sent to all nations to warn, and thereby they both employ theology as the means to contradict the First and Second Commandments based upon the Akada.
Substitute theology defines the corruption of both av tuma avoda zara theological belief systems. The NT supersessionism-fulfillment theology replaces the myth of JeZeus as the son of God for the oath brit sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people. This false religions parameter rejects the post Golden Calf Yom Kippur t’shuva wherein HaShem remembered the exact oaths sworn to the Avot that they and not Moshe alone would father the chosen Cohen people. This essential Torah theme first introduced with the rejection of Cain’s korban in favor of the korban dedicated by his younger brother.
Arab/Muslim supersessionism declares JeZeus a Torah prophet. Its replacement theology invents a new definition of the Torah term “prophet” as meaning that “Allah sends ‘prophets’ to all people, the last people who received “their” prophet who spoke “their” tongue – the Arab people. The koran hoax replaces Yishmael for Yitzak for the Akadah completely oblivious to the central Torah theme that HaShem chose Yitzak and rejected the first born son of Avram no different than HaShem accepted Hevel as the Cohen first born son on par with Yitzak blessing Yaacov with this oath blessing inheritance rather than Esau.
False prophets employ theology to seduce people to worship new Gods. Both false prophet NT/Koran theologies of Monotheism replace the revelation that Moshe took Israel out of Egyptian slavery to conquer the oath brit lands of Canaan as the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Neither Esau nor Yishmael share any portion in this oath brit inheritance which the revisionist history of both Book theologies deny.
The Jewish conception of monotheism simply NOT rooted from any Torah commandments. Both the first and second Sinai commandments distinguish the Divine Name Spirit revelation from the worship of other Gods. The interpretation of Monotheism a totally alien and false perversion, simply because it denies the 10 plagues by which the Divine Name Spirit brit-tribal god of Israel judged the Gods of Egypt. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai does not negate the existence or belief in other Gods, based simply upon the 2nd Sinai commandment. If only one tawhid God, then the 2nd Sinai commandment totally vain corrupt and utterly useless. The revelation of Torah judicial common law shares nothing with theological belief systems which worship other Monotheistic Universal Gods.
Slander defines Xtian & Muslim religious propaganda. A public posting – The Gospel of Isaiah serves as proof of just how corrupt and insane church propaganda perverts T’NaCH literature which predates the rise of Xtianity by almost 1000 years. NaCH prophets obey Moshe, prophets command mussar they do not foretell the future. This av tuma avoda zarah “fulfill the words of the prophets” the definition of witchcraft and divination.
Xtian and Arab/Muslim versions of some Universal Monotheistic God violates both the 1st & 2nd Sinai commandments just as dunking the head of a new born baby into water till it drowns amounts to first degree murder. Neither Esau nor Yishmael accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence, since only the 12 tribes of Israel accept the Torah revelation therefore the god of Israel a local tribal god. The notion promoted by both church & mosque of a Universal Monotheistic God masks the reality that Monotheism masks & conceals the fact that both religions of avoda zara worship other strange alien Gods.
The church propaganda which promotes JeZeus as God and mosque propaganda which promotes Allah as God – both amount to an exact duplication of the sin of the Golden Calf. Avoda zara not a actual golden calf – this metaphor alludes to the error of translating words which attempt to equivocate to Divine Spirits. Just as nothing in the Earth, Seas, or Heavens compares to the revelation of HaShem (first Sinai commandment) so too and how much more so word translations such as JeZeus or Allah as the definition of some theological Monotheistic creedal belief system!
Substitute theology defines the corruption of both av tuma avoda zara theological belief systems. The NT supersessionism-fulfillment theology replaces the myth of JeZeus as the son of God for the oath brit sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people. This false religions parameter rejects the post Golden Calf Yom Kippur t’shuva wherein HaShem remembered the exact oaths sworn to the Avot that they and not Moshe alone would father the chosen Cohen people. This essential Torah theme first introduced with the rejection of Cain’s korban in favor of the korban dedicated by his younger brother.
Arab/Muslim supersessionism declares JeZeus a Torah prophet. Its replacement theology invents a new definition of the Torah term “prophet” as meaning that “Allah sends ‘prophets’ to all people, the last people who received “their” prophet who spoke “their” tongue – the Arab people. The koran hoax replaces Yishmael for Yitzak for the Akadah completely oblivious to the central Torah theme that HaShem chose Yitzak and rejected the first born son of Avram no different than HaShem accepted Hevel as the Cohen first born son on par with Yitzak blessing Yaacov with this oath blessing inheritance rather than Esau.
False prophets employ theology to seduce people to worship new Gods. Both false prophet NT/Koran theologies of Monotheism replace the revelation that Moshe took Israel out of Egyptian slavery to conquer the oath brit lands of Canaan as the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Neither Esau nor Yishmael share any portion in this oath brit inheritance which the revisionist history of both Book theologies deny.
The Jewish conception of monotheism simply NOT rooted from any Torah commandments. Both the first and second Sinai commandments distinguish the Divine Name Spirit revelation from the worship of other Gods. The interpretation of Monotheism a totally alien and false perversion, simply because it denies the 10 plagues by which the Divine Name Spirit brit-tribal god of Israel judged the Gods of Egypt. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai does not negate the existence or belief in other Gods, based simply upon the 2nd Sinai commandment. If only one tawhid God, then the 2nd Sinai commandment totally vain corrupt and utterly useless. The revelation of Torah judicial common law shares nothing with theological belief systems which worship other Monotheistic Universal Gods.
The First and Second Commandments distinguish between the worship of the local tribal god of Israel and the existence of other Universal Monotheistic Gods. The Torah revelation at Sinai most definitely and clearly does not exclude the existence of other Gods. The plagues of Egypt and the oath brit cut at Gilgal by Yehoshua – that just as HaShem judged the Gods of Egypt so too HaShem likewise and equally judge the Gods of Canaan. The Rashi order of tefillen remembers the oath brit sworn at Gilgal. Proof that this essential concept of Torah faith applies equally straight across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen people.
Both av tuma avoda zarah religions which promote Universal Monotheism theologies negate and deny this critical understanding of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; just as both religions worship Gods based in Heaven and creedal theologies which frame their belief system Gods as the only one living God who dwells in Heaven above rather than within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people Yatzir Ha-Tov through tohor Spirits as Moshe orally heard at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf definition of av tuma avoda zara. The 2nd Sinai commandment, validates that Goyim worship other Gods/polytheism.
Dear Professor Falk,
I saw last week all the quarrels involving Huckabee and how such diabolical reasonings are frightening for regional relations and also do show a terrible degree of misunderstanding of the people of the entire Middle East as descendants of the Ancient People and of the continuation of the Ancient and Everlasting covenants and Ancient People of those covenants.
Because Our Time and Church Faith, and the Dispensation of Grace to All People and All Tribes does not allow for spilling of blood, and especially does not allow for spilling of the innocent blood, and the blood of the ancient Peoples that are under everlasting covenants, innocent partakers of the human continuation in the Middle East and the places where they exist as Abrahamic Descendants
Wow — and all that was happening, and is happening, shows the real face of Anti-Ancient-Semitic people and anti-their blessed Faith and blessed bloodlines to this day, even as we see them martyred and erased by the entire Westernish lay-clergy and their-cause plague that is in diabolical sacraments of the diabolical Abuse of the Ancient and Apostolic Church Order – that which puts them in diabolical hypnosis, diabolical trance, diabolical perversion of their minds, and fellowship of the perverted, diabolical minds, as and by which they blaspheme the Divine and Ever-existing Spirit, fall under enormous civil-ecclesiastical curses that are never-ending (in diabolical continuation in which they are and find themselves, in their perverted human existence).
I am so thankful to the Church that has raised me, and the incredible wisdom of the ordinary people of the small parish in which I grew up, that left the lasting mark of the Divine Spirit and Anointing that I recognized easily in the Ancient people of the Covenant, as you are.
While I will never fully understand the Faith of the Supreme Leader of Iran, His Excellency Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, I do understand that he was an Ancient People of the All-Abrahamic Covenants who served many citizens – both Iranian and international citizens and kept them safe from the diabolical cults and sects during his rule, as these diabolical cults and sects in diabolical hypnosis and trance seeked and still seek to plunge human continuation to the tipping points.
When laypeople and their lay clergy in diabolical order do not recognize the Ancient People of the All-Abrahamic Covenants who are in prophetic anointing of their ancestors – dismiss them and insult them in every way they can think of, and make attempts to harm and kill them – they will have received grave destruction upon themselves, and grave civil and ecclesiastical curses that are appointed by divine means.
I need to point this out to you, as well as that they are reaching out now for the things as such:
France to boost nuclear arsenal, could deploy atomic weapons to European allies | Watch
When all diplomacy fails for decades because of laypeople and lay clergy who are in diabolical hypnosis and diabolical trance, and diabolical unrighteousness, we all see and did see how much evil they have committed in Historical Palestine and how much diabolical hate they have had against the indigenous population of Historical Palestine, and especially Gaza that is in All-Abrahamic and Everlasting Covenants.
His Excellency Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will be missed by all believers, and I will remember his meekness and love for others in Everlasting Covenants, and bearing of their suffering in every way that was possible for him, as a humble priest-king in bearing in the sorrows of the Melchizedek, as a descendant of the Ancient Nation and descendant of Ancient Nations’ prophets.
I do hope that heads of their states can avoid delusions of diabolical fellowships and diabolical curses that are among diabolical satanic seals and hypnosis of all of that.
I hope they can finally start to see what all takes place when they illegally remove UN Mandates, and the human reason that they have lost among themselves.
When they start gravely oppressing and killing 80+year old wise men of Faith, their reason is certainly questionable, and how did they get themselves in such situations, in the first place, if not due to the diabolical delusions in which their reason and faith are…
I still hope that there is enough Grace of the Spirit left in the human race for the human continuation to go unharmed and continue once the old wise men of Faith and reason are gone.
Professor Falk,
I hope you are starting to see obnoxious lay-people, and their head of the state are jiggling more than what they can bear upon themselves, and it is not even a laughable punishment that is upon them – and it is just a beginning of it.
It is not possible that your UN mandate has not ceased to exist so that they cannot ever be called back to human reason and conscience.
They did what they did – their evil-doing and evil-righteousness is upon them, and with them as long as they exist in any form that they are and ever will be.
If they would remember All-Abrahamic Covenants that are among human race — diabolical lay people and their lay-clergy would not be in diabolical evil and chaos in which they are.
They are not quite clear on what they are up to.
In human reason and conscience — one cannot be responsible for any of that evil, and it is evil in which they were and are.
K.F.