Peace for Iran: Declaration of Global Conscience

9 Apr

Prefatory Note: Two Texts evant to Ongoing US/Israel War Against Iran in the context of a failing Ceaefire Agreement. Iran’s Conditions and Declaration of Global Conscience signed and individually affirmed by listed non-Iranians.]

“Six Non‑Negotiable Terms from international Scholars and Former Officials from 30 countries to End the U.S. War on Iran Amid Trump’s Threat of War Crimes”

The conscience of humanity resists “everything for us, nothing for others,” the creed of the predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations. The shameless rapacity and insolence have reached their zenith, and Trump’s threats illustrate the depraved spirit of a decaying civilisation. We must not be passive witnesses, but active architects of a new world where arrogance crumbles and righteousness prevails.

A large transnational group of prominent voices—including former UN officials, Retired career diplomats, former ministers, scholars and intellectuals, political figures and former parliamentarians, military and security professionals, artists, lawyers as well as journalists, activists, and antiwar leaders, from 30 countries—has released an open letter sharply criticising the global role of the United States and calling for a new international order centered on sovereignty and resistance to what they describe as Western domination.

Most of the signatories are from Western countries, alongside participants from Asia, Latin America, and Africa. The declaration, titled “A Declaration to the Conscience of Humanity,” was signed by over 170 signatories from countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, Portugal, Belgium, Italy, Scotland, Ireland, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Serbia, Poland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lithuania, Russia, China, Malaysia, India, Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Mexico, South Africa, Lebanon, Turkey, and Iran.

In this fact-based public letter, the authors deliver a sweeping critique of American foreign policy and historical conduct. The letter states that for “249 years—spanning the entirety of its existence since 1776—the United States built a record of atrocity that belonged to a darker, pre-civilised age,” describing the country as “a predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations.”

The signatories, including current and former professors affiliated with 52 universities and academic institutions worldwide, accuse Washington of maintaining global military dominance through an extensive overseas presence. They state that the United States operates “over 800 military garrisons poisoning more than 90 foreign countries and territories” and has cultivated what the signatories call “a doctrine of absolute predation.”

The declaration also condemns U.S. involvement in major wars of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, referring to what it calls “the genocidal horror of Vietnam,” “the annihilation of Cambodia,” and the “systematic slaughter of Koreans,” as well as the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan.

A central focus of the document is the ongoing confrontation involving Iran. These public figures argue that the current situation reflects what they describe as an expansionist U.S. strategy aimed at dominating global resources. According to the statement, the United States government is driven by “the demonic creed of ‘everything for us, nothing for others’,” which they say seeks control of global resources ranging from “the oil of Venezuela” to “the mineral wealth of Greenland” or “the energy reserves of Canada”.

The undersigned further assert that U.S. policy now “fixates on Iran” because the country possesses “over seven percent of the world’s mineral and energy wealth,” which they describe as “the final frontier of plunder.”

The document also criticizes contemporary American leadership, arguing that the “moral collapse of the West finds its embodiment in the pathetic figure of Mr. Trump,” and calling for what they describe as an end to “the era of pillage.”

Beyond its criticism of U.S. policy, the announcement proposes several demands that the signatories say are necessary to end the current war on Iran. These include guarantees against future aggression, the dismantling of U.S. military installations in the region, formal international condemnation of acts of aggression, reparations for damages caused by war, the establishment of a new legal framework for the Strait of Hormuz, recognising Iran’s sovereignty, and the prosecution and extradition of operatives in anti-Iranian media who have incited this bloodshed.

The authors also call on intellectuals, scholars, institutions, and civil society organizations worldwide to condemn what is described as the normalization of violations of international law and to challenge the global

structures that sustain domination and military intervention.

In conclusion, the signatories argue that the present moment represents a decisive historical turning point. “We stand with justice—not as passive witnesses, but as active architects of a new world,” the letter states, emphasizing that the international community must confront what it calls the return of predatory power in global politics.

Among the signatories are prominent scientists and figures representing a wide array of expertise and leadership, including philosophers, economists, historians, sociologists, jurists, theologians, Islamologists, reverends, biologists, physicians, musicians, filmmakers, songwriters, singers, entrepreneurs, engineers, novelists, theorists, as well as a physicist, a psychologist, an anthropologist, and a comedian. This diverse coalition reflects the global conscience of humanity, uniting professionals, scholars, and advocates from multiple disciplines in a shared call against U.S. exceptionalism.

The full text of the declaration, along with the complete list of signatories, has been released publicly in more than ten languages:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

A Declaration to the Conscience of Humanity

To the peoples of the world, to thinkers, to scholars, and to those who believe in justice:

A specter now haunts the conscience of humanity—the return of predatory power— and it shall no longer go unchallenged.

For 249 years—spanning the entirety of its existence since 1776—the United States built a record of atrocity that belonged to a darker, pre-civilised age; the predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations; from the genocide of nearly 5 million Indigenous peoples, to the brutal enslavement of over 4 million Africans, to the lynching of more than 4,000 Black citizens under Jim Crow. With over 800 military garrisons poisoning more than 90 foreign countries and territories, it cultivated a doctrine of absolute predation. From the genocidal horror of Vietnam, with over 3 million dead; to the annihilation of Cambodia, where 2 million perished under US-backed terror; to the systematic slaughter of Koreans, with more than 4 million Korean lives extinguished; to the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan, where one million Iraqis and tens of thousands of Libyans were consumed by US fire.

Yet the rational order that governs the world once helped humanity move beyond such practices. Humanity had consigned this barbarism to history. But now we are witnessing its return. The ongoing, systematic immolation of Gaza through the sustained support for the genocidal Israeli regime, where over 77,000 civilians in Palestine have been butchered—the scale of this atrocity reveals an inescapable truth: the pre-civilised practice has returned, and Washington has once again become its willing executor.

This is the demonic creed of “everything for us, nothing for others.” With shameless rapacity, it claims the resources of the world—whether the oil of Venezuela, the mineral wealth of Greenland, or the energy reserves of Canada—as objects of strategic entitlement. And now, that gluttonous eye fixates on Iran. Because Iran—possessing over 7% of the world’s mineral and energy wealth—is seen as the final frontier of plunder.

Yet this is no longer a matter of economics. It is a matter of honour. The world witnesses that the United States is actively engaged in a criminal enterprise termed the “Ramadan War” against the Iranian nation. This ongoing butchery has already claimed the lives of 208 innocent children. Let the world mark the date—168 of them were little girls, elementary students at the Shadjareh Tayyebeh School in Minab city in Iran, extinguished in their classrooms by US ordained terror.

Their futile and desperate contrivances aim at so-called “regime change” and the fragmentation of Iran—stripping the nation of its sovereignty and, thereby, facilitating the systematic plunder of its resources. In pursuit of this ultimate depravity, the U.S. brutally assassinated Iran’s spiritual and intellectual leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei—recognised globally as a voice against arrogance and terrorism—along with his family.

They have waged a war of targeted terror against the very pillars of the Iranian state. To date, US aggression has criminally murdered 39 Iranian statesmen, including the scientific genius Dr. Ali Larijani, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Now, the insolence has reached its zenith. The US President openly threatens the Iranian people on social media with the destruction of their energy infrastructure. This is the depraved spirit of a decaying civilisation. The moral collapse of the West finds its embodiment in the pathetic figure of Mr. Trump—a man whose catastrophic conduct over the last two years has exhausted not only the world, but his own people. The time has come to declare, with one voice: Enough! The era of pillage is over.

But the United States has made a fatal miscalculation. What stands before it is not merely a nation, but a civilisation that has weaponised its own DNA—ancient organisational genius fused with 21st-century scientific sovereignty. This is the reality of active deterrence by Iran; a global pole of power that dictates the terms of engagement, forcing strategic retreat by rewriting the very rules of active defence. Now, its adaptive reorganisation, civilisational continuity, and social unity have fused into a singular, unbreakable force.

Iran’s all-encompassing defence and active deterrence represents a golden opportunity to end global hegemony. The historical and civilisational doctrine of Iran is absolute: power does not confer right, and domination cannot serve as a foundation for justice. This is recognised as the bedrock of Iran’s invincibility. The world may avail itself of this historic turning point, drawing upon this very doctrine of liberation, to bring an end to domination and oppression wherever they may exist.

US and Israeli exceptionalism have dragged the world into an epoch defining choice between might and right, sovereignty and subjugation, dignity and dishonour. This moment must serve as the wake-up call for humanity to recognize that there is another way. It must impel people everywhere to do everything in their power to challenge the structures undergirding a global system that desecrates every moral value including the right to life itself.

Iran is the final frontier. If it falls, the hope of a better, enlightened future for the world dies with it. We cannot let that happen. The aggression against Iran is part of a system of global power that oppresses all of us. We cannot afford to stand by and watch arrogant authoritarianism running amok. Our very future depends on the success of Iran.

Therefore we cannot countenance any outcome of this war that involves a return to the status quo ante. Those who inflict such suffering must be made to pay a hefty price for their crimes. They must be made to realise that military might does not absolve them of the responsibility to uphold the laws on which the peace and security of our world depend. To that end, we support the terms set out by Iran for ending this war.

From the perspective of global justice, the terms for ending this war are absolute and non-negotiable:

  1. Guarantees against repetition and a binding international commitment ensuring no future aggression.
  2. The immediate dismantling of all US military installations in the region.
  3. Formal admission of aggression, international condemnation of the aggressors, and full reparations for life and property.
  4. An immediate end to war on all regional fronts.
  5. A new legal regime for the Strait of Hormuz, recognising Iran’s sovereignty.
  6. The prosecution and extradition of operatives in anti-Iranian media who have incited this bloodshed.

We, the undersigned in spirit, call upon our peers, the thinkers, the scholars, the institutions of conscience, and the advocates of justice across the world:

• Condemn the United States unequivocally for its systematic normalisation of contempt for international covenants and its reversion to the spirit of historical savagery and barbarism.

• Isolate the rogue regime of the United States diplomatically and economically for its ongoing crimes against humanity.

• Recognise Iran’s inherent right to active deterrence against unprovoked aggression.

• Demand the immediate cessation of American and U.S.-sponsored terrorism and the prosecution of those who order it.

As it has always done, history will record the courage of those who refuse to remain silent. We stand with justice—not as passive witnesses, but as active architects of a new world that has reached its threshold where arrogance crumbles and righteousness prevails. The arrogant must be dismantled. The world demands it. Justice will enforce it.

Signed in solidarity;

  1. Richard Falk (USA)

Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University and former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (2008 – 2014) author or editor of more than 50 books on international law and global politics

  • Denis Halliday (Ireland)

Former UN Secretary-General deputy and Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq, Gandhi International Peace Award (2003)

  • Norman Finkelstein (USA)

Highly internationally known political scientist, son of Holocaust-survivor parents, widely cited & recognized in Middle East political debate. former Professor at universities of DePaul, Princeton, Rutgers and New York

  • Avi Shlaim (UK)

Professor Emeritus of International Relations and Historian at St Antony’s College, Oxford University, British Academy Medal (2017) for lifetime achievement,PEN Hessell‑Tiltman Prize (2024) for historical writing

  • Hans von Sponeck (Germany)

Former UN Assistant Secretary-General and UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq

  • Alain de Benoist (France)

Internationally recognized philosopher and essayist whose work spans political theory, philosophy, history of religions, and cultural criticism, focused on critiques of liberalism, universalism, and modern egalitarian ideology

  • Chris Williamson (UK)

Former Shadow Ministerfor Communities and Local Government (2010 to 2013), Former member of Parliament for 7 years, former leader of Derby City Council

  • Boaventura de Sousa Santos (Portugal)

One of the world’s most internationally highly cited sociologists, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the School of Economics of the University of Coimbra, Distinguished Legal Scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, Founder of the World Social Forum & the concept of “Epistemologies of the South”, Frantz Fanon Lifetime Achievement Award (2022), Kalven Prize, Jabuti Award, Gulbenkian Science Prize

  • Jean Bricmont (Belgium)

Internationally cited theoretical physicist and philosopher of science, Professor at the Catholic University of Louvain, author/co-author of several books including Fashionable Nonsense and Humanitarian Imperialism

  1. Dieudonné (France)

Internationally recognized Artist and Stand-up Comedian, author of more than 25 one-man shows, recipient of the Grand Prix de l’Humour Noir (2000) for his contribution to satirical comedy

  1. Hamid Algar (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Persian studies at the University of California, Berkeley, King Faisal Prize laureate

  1. Oya Baydar (Turkey)

Iconic Novelist and Sociologist who spent years in political exile after the 1980 Turkish coup d’état, later she returned and continued her literary career. She holds 5 Awards on novels, literature, short story and culture

  1. Philip Giraldi (USA)

Counterterrorism Expert and Columnist, Executive Director of the non-profit, non-partisan anti-war advocacy group The Council for the National Interest (CNI), Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

  1. Imam Suhaib Webb (UK)

Former imam of the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center, Former Resident Scholar of the Islamic Center of New York University, founder of Ella Collins Institute, one of the World’s 500 Most Influential Muslims list by the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre (2010), recipient as Best Muslim Blog of the Year and Best Muslim Tweeter of the Year by Brass Crescent Awards

  1. Cynthia McKinney (USA)

Former Congresswomen for 6 terms (Georgia), Assistant Professor and Director of the Office of External Affairs at North South University; recipient of various peace and human-rights awards (e.g., peace advocacy awards)

  1. Ann Wright (USA)

Army Colonel and Former US diplomat who resigned in 2003 in opposition to the US war on Iraq, Jurist

  1. Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid (Malaysia)

President of Malaysia Consultative Council of Islamic Organizations

  1. R. Roshan Baig (India)

Former seven-time member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Former Minister of Home Affairs, Former Minister for Urban Development, Former Minister for Infrastructure

  1. Saied Reza Ameli (Islamic Republic of Iran)

Full Professor of Communication and Global Studies at the University of Tehran, Head of the UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture, Founder and Dean of the Faculty of World Studies, Editor-in-chief of Journal of Cyberspace Studies, Member of Iranian Academy of Sciences as well as two High State Cultural Councils

  • Haim Bresheeth (UK)

Retired Professorial Research Associate Professor of Film, Media and Cultural Studies, and Visual Culture at the School of SOAS, the University of East London, Campaign Against Misrepresentation in Public Affairs

  • Mohammad Marandi (Islamic Republic of Iran)

Full Professor of English Literature, Orientalism and American Studies at University of Tehran

  • Ajamu Baraka (USA)

2016 Green Party nominee for Vice President, Anti-Colonial fighter and Veteran of U.S. Black Liberation Movement, Founder of Black Alliance for Peace

  • Bijan Abdolkarimi (Islamic Republic of Iran)

Philosopher, prominent intellectual in post October 7th era, focused on ontology and political philosophy, specializing in the thought of Martin Heidegger, Associate Professor of philosophy in Islamic Azad University

  • Daud Abdullah (UK)

Director of Middle East Monitor and former Deputy Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain

  • Vijay Prashad (India)

Director of TricontinentalInstitute for Social Research, editor of LeftWord Books, Chief Correspondent at Globetrotter, and senior fellow at Renmin University of China, advisory board member of the US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, co-founder of the Forum of Indian Leftists, Muzaffar Ahmad Book Prize, Paul A. Baran–Paul M. Sweezy Memorial Award

  • Ramón Grosfoguel (USA)

Sociologist and Professor Emeritus at the Department of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley

  • Lawrence Davidson (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Middle East History at West Chester University (WCU)

  • David Miller (UK)

Sociologist and former professor at the University of Strathclyde, the University of Bath and the University of BristolCo-Director of Spinwatch

  • Abbas Edalat (UK)

Professor of Computer Science and Mathematics at Imperial College London and founder of the Science and Arts Foundation (SAF) and Campaign against Sanctions, Military and Imperial Interventions (CASMII)

  • Dinah Shelton (USA)

Professor Emeritus of International Law at George Washington University Law School; former Commissioner and President of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2010–2014), Elizabeth Haub Prize for Environmental Law (2006), International Environmental Law Award (2016)

  • Jodi Dean (USA)

Political Theorist and Professor at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, former Erasmus Professor of the Humanities in the Faculty of Philosophy at Erasmus University Rotterdam

  • Peter Limb (USA)

Internationally recognized Historian and Professor at Michigan State University

  • Michael Maloof (USA)

Former Senior Security Policy Analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense

  • Michael Springmann (USA)

Former Diplomat in Germany and Saudi Arabia, Attorney and Counsellor at Law, Doctor of Law

  • Augusto Sinagra (Italy)
    Professor Emeritus of International Law at Sapienza University of Rome
  • Syed Sadatullah Husaini (India)

President of India’s biggest Muslim origination (Jamaat-e-Islami Hind)

  • Angelo d’Orsi (Italy)

Historian of Philosophy and Professor Emeritus of History of Political Doctrines at the University of Turin

  • Sibel Edmonds (USA)

Exposer of corruption and intelligence failures within U.S. government agencies, PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award (2006), Sam Adams Award for Integrity in Intelligence (2012)

  • Kevin B. MacDonald (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Evolutionary Psychology at California State University, Long Beach (CSULB)

  • Alberto Bradanini (Italy)

Former director of UN Interregional Crime & Justice Research Institute UN Research Institute on Crime & Drugs, former ambassador in Tehran and Beijing, president of the Centre for Contemporary China Studies in Italy

  • James H. Fetzer (USA)

McKnight Professor Emeritus of the Philosophy of Science at the University of Minnesota Duluth

  • Piero Bevilacqua (Italy)

Historian, Professor of Contemporary History at the Sapienza University of Rome, author of 34 books

  • Claudio Mutti (Italy)

Former Professor at the University of Bologna, Director of “Eurasia, Rivista di Studi Geopolitici”

  • Siddiqullah Chowdhury (India)

Representative of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, member of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC)

  • Claudio Moffa (Italy)

Former Professor of History of International Relations at the University of Teramo

  • Maria Poumier (France)

Professor at University of Havana, Former Professor at the University of Paris (Sorbonne), documentary maker

  • Bruno Drweski (France)

Professor Emeritus at the National Institute of Oriental Languages ​​and Civilizations (Université Paris-Cité) and Paris Geopolitics Academy

  • Paulina Aroch Fugellie (Mexico)

Full Professor at the Department of Humanities, Metropolitan Autonomous University

  • Munyaradzi Mushonga (South Africa)

Global Academic Director for the Decolonial International Network (DIN), Associate Professor at the University of the Free State

  • Mufti Mukarram Ahmed (India)

Religious and literary scholar, Imam of India’s second largest mosque (Shahi Masjid Fatehpuri)

  • Alain Corvez (France)

Colonel of French Army, former advisor minister of defense, former deputy to the General Commanding the UN Force in South Lebanon, advisor in international affairs

  • Jodie Evans (USA)

Co-founder of the anti-war organization Code Pink, Filmmaker, former board chair of Rainforest Action Network

  • Jean-Louis Poirier (France)

Philosopher, Historian and Translator

  • Zlatko Hadžidedić (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Political Scientist and Director of the Center for Nationalism Studies in Sarajevo

  • Elizabeth Murray (USA)

Former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for the Near East at the National Intelligence Council; member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

  • Pepe Escobar (Brazil)

Geopolitical Analyst and Journalist who has written for Asia Times, Mondialisation.ca, CounterPunch, Al-Jazeera, RT, Sputnik, Strategic Culture Foundation and Guancha

  • Rodney Shakespeare (UK)

Economist and Visiting Professor at Trisakti University, Expert on Binary Economics

  • Salman Hussaini Nadwi (India)

Founding member/chairman of numerous religious, medical, IT and engineering colleges and hospitals, scholar and professor in the Islamic sciences, author of numerous scholarly works, President of Jamiat Shabaab ul Islam, editor and co-editor of thirteen different periodicals in English, Urdu, Persian and Arabic languages 

  • Ralph Bosshard (Switzerland)

Former Military Advisor to the Secretary General of Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

  • Daniel Estulin (Lithuania)

Writer and international speaker, author of “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group”

  • Peter Koenig (Switzerland)

Economist and Geopolitical Analyst with more than 30 years of experience in the World Bank, the World Health Organization and the Swiss Development Cooperation

  • İbrahim Betil (Turkey)

Founding President of the Turkish Education Volunteers Foundation, Businessman and Social Entrepreneur, former CEO of Tekfen Holding, Multiple Turkish civil society and philanthropy awards

  • Tommy Sheridan (Scotland)

Candidate for Glasgow in 2026 Scottish Parliamentary Elections, Former Member of the Parliament, Former Convenor of Scottish Socialist Party, Former Glasgow City Councillor, former Convenor of Solidarity

  • Christoph Hörstel (Germany)

Author and Expert on Security, NATO Policies, Geopolitics, and German foreign policy, Publicist

  • Sara Flounders (USA)

Co-director of the International Action Center and Secretariat Member of the Workers World Party

  • Kevin J. Barrett (USA)

Arabist-Islamologist Scholar, former Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Zakia Soman (India)

Former Professor of Business Communication at the University of Gujarat, Founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) on women’s rights, member of South Asian Alliance for Poverty Eradication (SAAPE)

  • Stephen Sizer (UK)

Former Vicar of Christ Church of Virginia Water in Surrey and director of the Peacemaker Trust

  • E. Michael Jones (USA)

Former Professor of English literature at Saint Mary’s College (Indiana), founder of Culture Wars Magazine

  • Tim Anderson (Australia)

Political Economist, Director of Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, Former Senior lecturer at the University of Sydney 

  • Piers Robinson (UK)

Former Professor of Political Journalism, International Politics and Political Communication at Universities of Sheffield, Manchester and Liverpool, Co-Director Organisation for Propaganda Studies & Research Director at 
the International Center for 9/11 Justice

  • Pino Cabras (Italy)

Former Vice-President of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Italian Parliament

  • Jean Michel Vernochet (France)

Former Journalist of Le Figaro Magazine, Writer and Geopolitical Analyst

  • Angelo Persiani (Italy)

Former Ambassador in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Sweden

  • Guillermo Barreto (Venezuela)

Biologist and Retired Full Professor at the Organisms Biology Department of Simón Bolívar University

  • Mateusz Piskorski (Poland)

Former Professor at University of Szczecin and Jan Długosz University, Co-founder of the European Center of Geopolitical Analysis, former member of the Polish Parliament in the Assembly of Western European Union

  • Declan Hayes (Ireland)

Retired Professor at the Sophia University of Tokyo

  • Anisur Rahman Qasmi (India)

Scholar, community leader, Former vice president of the All India Milli Council, lecturer on Islamic jurisprudence 

  • Dave Smith (Australia)

Anglican priest, Social Educator, Boxer, 2022 Candidate in Federal Election – United Australia Party (Grayndler)

  • Aran Martin (Australia)

Managing Editor of the Institute of Postcolonial Studies (IPCS), Professor at University of Melbourne, Executive Director of Global Security Foundation, Editor of Postcolonial Studies

  • David Rovics (USA)

Singer and Songwriter, Musician focused on US wars, globalization, anarchism, social justice and labor history, ASCAP Deems Taylor Award

  • Vito Petrocelli (Italy)

Former Chairman of Foreign affairs committee of Italian Senate, Editorial Director of AntiDiplomatico,

  • Dilek Bektas (Turkey)

Retired Professor at Mimar Sinan Fine Art University

  • Veysel Dinler (Turkey)

Professor of law at Hitit University

  • Christian Bouchet (France)

Anthropologist, Former Politician and Antiwar Activist

  • Hacer Ansal (Turkey)

Professor of Sociology at Işık University, Expert on Social Theory and Gender

  • Denijal Jegić (Lebanon)

Professor of communication in the Department of Communication at Lebanese American University

  • Pawel Moscicki (Poland)

Professor at the Polish Academy of Sciences, Philosopher, Essayist, host of the Inny Swiat podcast

  • Vanessa Beeley (France)

Photographer and Independent Journalist on Middle Eastern issues based in Syria

  • Massoud Shadjareh (UK)

Chair of Islamic Human Rights Commission-London, holding consultative status at the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs

  • Zeki Kılıçaslan (Turkey)

Professor of chest diseases at Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Social Justice Advocate

  • Sandew Hira (Netherlands)

Founder of Decolonial International Network known for his Decolonial Theory, Director of International Institute for Scientific Research

  • Paul Larudee (USA)

Founder of the Free Gaza Movement and the Free Palestine Movement, Member of the International Solidarity Movement, co-speaker of the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla

  • Yvonne Ridley (UK)

Secretary General of European Muslim League, Candidate for Glasgow in 2026 Scottish Parliamentary Elections, Former President of the International Muslim Women’s Union

  • Konrad Rekas (Poland–Scotland)

Lecturer at Nottingham Trent University, Member of Polish YES for Scotland

  • James Perloff (USA)

Author, Researcher, and former Editor-In-Chief of The New American magazine

  • Lucien Cerise (France)

Author of Governing by Chaos, Antiwar activist and Geopolitical Analyst

  • Jürgen Cain Külbel (Germany)

Criminologist, Investigative Journalist, Author of a book on Israel’s role in assassination of Hariri

  • Carol Brouillet (USA)

Peace activist, co-founder of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance, and Green Party candidate for the U.S. Congress in California (2006, 2008, 2012)

  1. Dogan Bermek (Turkey)

President of Alevi Philosophy Center Association, Former President of the Alavi Federation of Turkiye

  1. Gilles Munier (France)

Investigative Journalist and Secretary General of the Franco-Iraqi Friendships Association

  1. Rebecca Shoot (USA)

International lawyer, Co-Convener of Washington Working Group for the International Criminal Court and Co-Convener ImPact Coalition on Strengthening International Judicial Institutions

  1. Leonid Savin (Russia)

Chief editor of Geopolitika.ru (from 2008), founder and chief editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs

  1. Rich Siegel (USA)

Pianist, songwriter, writer and peace activist, and 2015 Green Party political candidate in New Jersey

  1. Gordon Duff (USA)

Former UN Diplomat in Iraq, Vietnam War Marine

  1. Marion Sigaut (France)

Historian, Essayist, and Researcher on French history and political thought

  1. Caleb Maupin (USA)

Founder of Center for Political Innovation, Journalist

  1. Jacob Cohen (France)

Academic, Novelist and Antiwar Activist

  1. Ken O’keefe (USA–Ireland)

Former Marine and Gulf War veteran, antiwar activist

  1. Rainer Rupp (Germany)

Economist and Journalist

  1. Thomas Werlet (France)

Leader of Mouvement FRANCE RÉSISTANCE 

  1. Dragana Trifković (Serbia)

Director General of the Center for Geostrategic Studies &President of the Eurasian Media Forum

  1. Feroze Mithiborwala (India)

Columnist and Founder of India Iran Friendship Forum

  1. Imam Muhammad al-Asi (USA)

Former Imam of the Islamic Center of Washington, Research Fellow at the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought

  1. Benedetto Ligorio (Italy)

Assistant Professor at the Department of philosophy of Sapienza University of Rome

  1. Rania Masri (USA)
    Co-Director of North Carolina Environmental Justice Network
  1. Haydeé García Bravo (Mexico)

Associate Researcher at Center of Interdisciplinarity Research in Science and Humanities, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)

  1. José Gandarilla Salgado (Mexico)

Senior Researcher at Center of Interdisciplinarity Research in Science and Humanities, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)

  1. Finian Cunningham (Ireland)

Author and Journalist at Strategic Culture Foundation

  1. Margherita Furlan (Italy)

Journalist and director of Casa Del Sole TV

  1. Eva Bartlett (CanadaUSA)

Independent journalist, war correspondent, and activist focusing on Middle East conflicts

  1. Teša Tešanović (Serbia)

Journalist and TV host, founder of Balkan Info

  1. Claude Janvier (France)

Writer, Essayist and Columnist

  1. Eric Walberg (Canada)

Geopolitical Expert and Author

  1. Valérie Bugault (France)

Jurist and geopolitical analyst; Jurist

  1. Adrián Salbuchi (Argentina)

Political Analyst and Writer

  1. Yvan Benedetti (France)

One of the prominent leaders of Yellow Vests Movement

  1. Yannick Sauveur (France)

Writer and Geopolitical analyst

  1. Pierre-Antoine Plaquevent (France)

Writer, political analyst, and international consultant, Head the Strategika think tank and the Polemos newsletter

  1. Arnaud Develay (France)

Political Consultant and International Legal Expert

  1. Michael Spath (USA)

Executive Director of Indiana Center for Middle East Peace

  1. Zhu Haozeng (China)

Editor in Chief of Haikou Xianjielun Cultural Media

  1. António Gomes Marques (Portugal)

Retired Banking Director, Essayist

  1. Haleh Niazmand (USA)

Professor of Art at Modesto Junior College, Conceptual Artist, Curator, and Art Critic

  1. Claude Timmerman (France)
    Biologist, statistician, and researcher in population genetics; Essayist, commentator of Boulevard Voltaire
  1. Hafsa Kara-Mustapha (UK)

Journalist and Author, Head of Global Operations African Legacy Foundation

  1. Ginette Hess Skandrani (France)

Antiwar activist and member of Parti des Verts (French Green party)

  1. Yacob Mahi (Belgium)

Theologian and Islamologist, Professor of Islamic Studies

  1. Adam Shamir (Sweden)

Writer, Journalist, and Political Commentator

  1. Jean-Loup Izambert (France)

Independent Investigative Journalist and Writer

  1. Zafar Bangash (Canada)

Director Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought in Toronto

  1. Imad Hamrouni (France)

Professor at Académie de Géopolitique de Paris, expert on Middle Eastern affairs

  1. Joe Iosbaker (USA)

Coordinator of the March on the Democratic National Convention 2024 to Stand With Palestine

  1. Richard Haley (UK)

Chair of Scotland Against Criminalising Communities

  1. David J. Reilly (USA)

Independent Journalist, Political Commentator, Former Candidate for Governor of Idaho in 2020

  1. Nasreen Methai (India)

Founding member of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA); an NGO working on women’s rights

  1. Kim Petersen (USA)

Co-editor of the Dissident Voice newsletter

  1. Stefano Bonilauri (Italy)

Journalist and Director of Anteo Edizioni

  1. Tobias Pfennig (Germany)

Software Engineer and political activist

  1. Tony Gosling (UK)

Investigative journalist and political activist

  1. Zhang Shouliang (China)
    Deputy editor-in-chief of Haikou Xianjielun Cultural Media
  1. Steven Sahiounie (USA)
    Award Winning Journalist and chief editor of MidEastDiscourse
  1. Ümit Aktaş (Turkey)

Physician, specialist in herbal therapy and acupuncture

  1. Imran Mohd Rasid (Malaysia)

Executive Director of Citizens International

  1. Aly Bakkali (Belgium)

President of Partie Islam, antiwar activist

  1. Fatma Orgel (Turkey)

Physician at Esenler Clinic, antiwar activist

  1. Gurhan Ertur (Turkey)

Director of the NGO Citizen Initiative, antiwar activist

  1. Luca Arrighi (Italy)
    Logician and designer of deterministic governance architectures 

  2. Dave Cannon (UK)

Chair of Jewish Network for Palestine

  1. Fatma Akdokur (Turkey)

Theology Instructor, antiwar activist

  1. Houman Mortazavi (Canada)

Barrister and Solicitor, antiwar activist

  1. S.Q Massod (India)

Secretary of ASEEM, antiwar activist

  1. Richard Ray (USA)

Editor and Antiwar Activist

  1. Shabbir Ali Warsi (India)

Scholar and Antiwar Activist

  1. Abbas Ali (UK)

InMinds Human Rights Group

  1. Norma Hashim (Malaysia)

Treasurer of Viva Palestina Malaysia

  1. Saidi Nordine (Belgium)

Co-spokesperson of Bruxelles Pantheres

  1. Iqbal Jassat (South Africa)

Executive Member of Media Review Network

  1. Syed Farid Nizami (India)

Scholar and Antiwar Activist

  1. Asif Ali Zaidi (India)

Lawyer and Researcher, antiwar activist

  1. Kerem Ali (UK)

Spokesperson of Palestine Pulse

  1. Syed Mounis Abidi (India)

Human Rights Lawyer, antiwar activist

  1. Joe Lorincz (Australia)

Wentworth Falls NSW

  1. Mouhad Reghif (Belgium)

Co-spokesperson of Bruxelles Pantheres

 Signatories are signing in their individual capacities and affiliations are for identification purposes only.

7 Responses to “Peace for Iran: Declaration of Global Conscience”

  1. mosckerr's avatar
    mosckerr April 9, 2026 at 3:30 pm #

    Do not confuse the protagonists of this war. The paper tiger NATO states of Britain, France, and Germany seek the destruction of the President’s war to destroy the ability of Iran to become a nuclear power. Herein defines the “stakes” of this war. Why? Because following the Oct 7th Abomination War the Trump Gaza Peace Board excluded Russia, Britain, UN and France – that Quartet gone if the US Israel alliance wins this war and the Mullahs leave Persia for ever.

  2. Jerry Alatalo's avatar
    Jerry Alatalo April 10, 2026 at 6:26 am #

    Ms. Marjorie Taylor Greene drives to the heart of the matter:

    On Easter morning, this is what President Trump posted. Everyone in his administration that claims to be a Christian needs to fall on their knees and beg forgiveness from God and stop worshiping the President and intervene in Trump’s madness. I know all of you and him and he has gone insane, and all of you are complicit. I’m not defending Iran but let’s be honest about all of this. The Strait is closed because the US and Israel started the unprovoked war against Iran based on the same nuclear lies they’ve been telling for decades, that any moment Iran would develop a nuclear weapon.

    You know who has nuclear weapons? Israel. They are more than capable of defending themselves without the US having to fight their wars, kill innocent people and children, and pay for it. Trump threatening to bomb power plants and bridges hurts the Iranian people, the very people Trump claimed he was freeing. On Easter, of all days, we as Christians should be reminded that the son of God died and rose from the grave so that we can be forgiven once and for all of our sins. Jesus commanded us to love one another and forgive one another. Even our enemies. Our President is not a Christian and his words and actions should not be supported by Christians. Christians in the administration should be pursuing peace. Urging the President to make peace. Not escalating war that is hurting people. This NOT what we promised the American people when they overwhelmingly voted in 2024, I know, I was there more than most. This is not making America great again, this is evil.

  3. mosckerr's avatar
    mosckerr April 10, 2026 at 7:35 am #

    Compare that UN SC 242 propaganda to the current slander of Alex Jones: From “Lone Warrior” to “Nuclear Madness”.

    The Democrap talking point that perverted President Trump’s steadfast refusal for the Mullah regime in Iran, even before President Reagan replaced Jimmy Carter. The latter’s attempt to employ helicopters to insert special forces troops to free US embassy hostages the Mullah fanatics seized, during a desert wind storm – made with the coming Presidential elections in mind rather than the safety of US personnel. This self-centered shift of priorities exploded Carter’s re-election bid. In the same manner, Alex Jones too, post the Court-Case which closed him in particular and his InfoWars studio down due to his inflammatory touching the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting which horrified the nation roughly 6 months in Obama’s 2nd term as President.

    Alex Jones repeatedly claimed that the 2012 shooting – staged and that the parents merely Hollywood like actors. In like manner he now condemns President Trump’s war rhetoric “total eradication”, to general genocide of the Iranian people rather than the total war removal of the fanatic Mullahs and their drive to attain nuclear weapons by which to attack the Great and Small Satan’s.

    UN Resolution 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! This UN slander ie European imperialism took advantage of LBJ involvement in the Vietnam War to re-insert Britain and France as great power brokers who themselves determine the balance of power in the Middle East. The 1922 League “Palestine Mandate” based upon 19th Century French maps which the “Sick Man of Europe” acquired which labelled Ottoman Greater-Syria as “Palestine”, coupled with the post WWI British/French division of Sykes-Picot which which devied or apportioned the spoils of the corpse of the Ottoman empire divided up between the two remaining standing Allied empires in Europe including Russia.

    UN 242 propaganda changed the original Palestine League mandate to include an Arab Palestinian state which all Arab states themselves universally rejected in Britain language of UN General Assembly 181. 19th Century European colonial aspirations and maps, redefined territorial boundaries in ways that served great power domination of the balance of power in any given region. British division of Iraq separated from a warm water port in Kuwait and the division of India into two warring nations serve as examples to understand European “interests” to insert their dictates into the Middle East. Absolutely no different from the latest slander “internationalist Democrats in Congress” employ the war rhetoric “total eradication”, as to all Iranians rather than limited to the Mullah communist dictators who themselves seek nuclear destruction of the Great and small Satan’s.

    Post the ’56 Suez crisis IKE terminated the great power status of both London and Paris. Prior to the 2nd Shoah – according to the declared statements of Nasser himself; who promised to rectify the Arab Nakba disgrace! Nakba, not the post ’67 humiliating Arab defeat which switched the narrative to the poor Palestinians peoples scattered into the winds. But rather the ’48 Arab disgrace the invading Arab states failure to throw the Jews into the Sea – Nakba!

    Therefore UN 242, with LBJ’s butt exposed in Vietnam, London & Paris attempted to re-insert their domination in determining the balance of power in the Middle East which IKE utterly negated. UN 242 fits in harmony with Truman’s “containment policy”, and the British empire’s policy of maintaining the balance of power/England as top dog\ resemble one another’s national interests.

    France surrendered to the Nazis after 6 months of actual army on army fighting. So their ‘great power’ status has never recovered from their Nakba defeat. Post ’56 London had to brown-nose Washington. However, the Trump Era Washington, while it has “yet” to pull out of NATO, the stink of the NATO corpse in the air. The Trump political rhetoric that describes NATO as a “Paper Tiger” plays well with giving Putin a face saving out of the Nakba Ukraine war. International politics, while it resembles poker – far more nuanced and complex.

    UN 242: language ambiguity did not “invent” a Palestinian state. But it most certainly serves as the concealed foundation by which all post 242 UN condemnations of Israeli settlements which culminated in Obama’s 2334 which prioritized London and Paris’s efforts to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East strategic interests! Openly clashes with Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords, recognition of Jerusalem and the Golan as part of Israel’s international permanent Capital and borders and Trump 2.0 Gaza Peace Board which excludes Russia, Britain, the UN, and Frog quartet as great power players in the Middle East. The stench of the dead NATO alliance – EU hostility to US economic dominance within EU economies.

    The UN employs the rhetoric of “peace” no different than how Chamberlain did after he personally betrayed the Czech Republic in 1938. Political rhetoric whores “peace” which its lies employ as merely a sweet perfume “noun” that has no teeth. Shalom by stark and obvious contrast a verb that stands upon the foundation of “Trust”. No trust No Shalom. Just that simple.

    For example: The entire history of European and Arab empires have played the back and forth – something like tennis – the “Jewish problem”. Post Shoah ’48 Israel’s have sworn a formal Torah oath: “NEVER AGAIN”. Meaning, Israelis reject foreign power dictates which determine “Final Solutions” for their bogus racist “Jewish Problems”.

    • mosckerr's avatar
      mosckerr April 13, 2026 at 4:08 am #

      Blood libel, historically, refers to false allegations against Jews, particularly the accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children to use their blood in rituals. This form of anti-Semitism has deep roots, with various instances tracing back centuries, often serving as a catalyst for violence against Jewish communities. In contemporary discourse, accusations akin to blood libel resurface in various forms, often targeting Jewish individuals or leaders.

      A recent example discussed involves claims suggesting that Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi) effectively controls former President Donald Trump. This narrative plays into long-standing anti-Semitic tropes about Jewish manipulation and control, particularly in Western politics. The allegation that Netanyahu controls Trump can be seen as a modern incarnation of blood libel, suggesting nefarious intent behind political alliances. This reflects broader themes in anti-Semitic rhetoric where Jewish influence is portrayed as overwhelmingly powerful and sinister.

      The evolution of blood libel accusations—from horrific historical claims to modern political smears—illustrates a persistent thread of anti-Semitism. Both the historical and contemporary instances demonstrate the need for vigilance and active engagement against such rhetoric. Understanding these narratives is crucial for fostering dialogue and combating anti-Semitism today.

  4. Kata Fisher's avatar
    Kata Fisher April 10, 2026 at 11:59 pm #

    Dear Professor Falk,

    It was, and is, a historical chaos that has defeated and continues to defeat everyone’s purpose in the Middle East, both civil and ecclesiastical.

    Not only that, but it is also getting worse just because it is not in human order (neither civilly, nor ecclesiastically). Abuse of the Ancient and Apostolic Church Order does that to the laypeople and their diabolical lay-order-SOCIETY.

    Abuse of the Ancient and Apostolic Church order during the late 1800’s and the post-Azuza Street outpour of the Spirit, which brought on diabolical confusions, and also the Berlin Declaration of 1909, is noting that has not remained with human continuation – to this day – it will not go away, until it is made to go away: International Laws, AND Geneva Conventions can not stop grave harms of it. But how could it ever have had?

    Those Landmarks should never have been manipulated by anyone, and never EVER should be manipulated by mankind.

    Obnoxious laypeople are going about something.  Fine, they will see in their accursed graves how that has worked out for them. THEY SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR THE LANDMARKS. Or did they not get what they had asked for?  WHY NOT? Was it THEIRS to ask in the first place?

    Or was it that the time in which that they asked for something was not sufficiently appropriate, and was just wrong, and they stubbornly continued in things that they should never have had?

    Obnoxious and accursed cults and sects are what they are – there is nothing that can be done about that.  It is eternal damnation, and all works toward just that – nothing else.

    Looking back through history, they have grave sins and blood guilt among themselves. There is nothing that can be done with the cults and sects – their only way is killing, and the guilt of the blood that they bring upon themselves, and that is what they teach their offspring, just as well.

    No matter what they have been told, their feet will run to commit grave evil and destruction against themselves and everyone else.

    Most importantly, that further chaos is contained by the Church and everyone else who is competent to understand the grave harm to humanity, and human continuation that lay-people and their clergy who are diabolical seals of the devil and able to create both for themselves and everyone else.  

    Because the UN Charters and the Geneva Conventions have been put aside, the World Governments and their leaders, who are in their right mind, need to step up to the plate and make sure that human continuity is protected, and further warfare that can lead to the unbearable consequences for human continuity must be regulated successfully, and stopped.

    All the evil and killing that they have committed, and NOW WHAT?

    What is next for them?

    They do not understand their human reality, and they are not paying attention to what they have been told about what they are doing to humanity and human continuation.

    Laypeople are foolish.

    And diabolical Cruelty to their neighbor does not justify and saves them from NEVER AGAIN doctrines, at all. Honestly, they should have had human continuation among themselves, instead.

    I assure you that they think that they have human continuation among themselves. I assure you that they think that they can see it for themselves.

    Bizarre, never-ending evils of the obnoxious lay people, in their human continuity that takes them straight into the Abyss, dominion which they are. They live, they breath, and they live and they move in that.

    Diabolical plots, and diabolical killing are piling up with them.

    and miraculously, everyone else is hater and antisemitic, instead.

    Between all of them self’s and all the weaponry that they have had and have among themselves, they NONE OF THEM combined have enough humanity among themselves to start recovery of human remains in Gaza.

    Diabolical curses and diabolical shame are with them along with their human continuity in the ILLIGALY OCCUPIED ECCLESIALISTICAL LAND.

    That is their only promise that they have and ever will have among themselves, AS WE ALL SEE IT IN THIS DAY. Only blind and obnoxious laypeople can’t see that.

    YO’ YO’ YO lay-people: GO and appoint yourself the landmarks and go and have someone appoint you some landmarks whenever you and them can. LOL! Bizarre evil.

    The Land belongs to the Palestinian race of Humanity, among humanity IS PALASTINE OF ABRAHAM, FATHER OF OUR FAITH.

    Geneva Charters of 1949 is the #1 to begin with in order to sustain some of this chaos among obnoxious, and just diabolical lay-people and their diabolical lay-clergy in diabolical seals of devil and works of it.

    What do they think that Abuse of the Ecclesiastical Order, Sacred Texts and Blaspheming of the Spirit does and will always do to them — in all generations?

    K.F.

  5. mosckerr's avatar
    mosckerr April 12, 2026 at 8:33 pm #

    Well it seems, though bombs have yet to fall, that the war with Iran shall resume. Personally the weight of these wars – starting with the Oct 7th Abomination War – quite exhausting.

    When Yidden face adversity we often tend to turn to the foundations of our national identity. Unlike the Arab Koran and the Xtian NT/OT-Bible, the Hebrew T’NaCH has a completely different set of priorities which fundamentally changes how the Hebrew read, learned and interpreted. For the Sages recorded in the sealed Masoret of the Shas Talmud the greatest commandment of the Torah – upon which all other Torah commandments hang like a huge mountain hanging from a single hair – the 1st Sinai Commandment. Upon this single revelation, all other Torah commandments hinge upon – does a person keep these other commandments in the רוח הקודש Horev revelation of the 13 tohor Spirit revelation – how to accept the 1st Sinai commandment לשמה?

    How to correctly understand the 2nd Sinai commandment … interpreted specifically how it contrasts with the 1st Sinai commandment.

    שמות כ:ב, that entire verse defines the 1st Sinai positive commandment. Which distinguishes the revelation of the Name שם השם (which I purposely do not write) from all other Divine Name references made in the Book of בראשית. These latter Divine Names, Avraham, for example, called upon אל שדי and did not know the שם השם. Meaning the prophets in the Book of בראשית called upon “their” God – who filled both the Heavens and the Earth. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai in the 1st Sinai commandment – the revelation that the שם השם, first and foremost a Spirit and not a word. The sin of the Golden Calf employs the word אלהים. Thereafter Moshe returned and fasted another 40 days and nights and received the revelation that the שם השם — a רוח הקןדש and not a word; furthermore this שם השם – radically differs from all the Divine Names which the Avot called upon in the Book of בראשית in that תורה לא בשמים היא. Herein defines the crux of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. This Hebrew term לשמה, does not mean “for its own sake”. Rather that the Horev 13 tohor spirits אל רחום וחנון etc these spirits NOT words which the lips can pronounce. But rather spirit which dwell, as in the משל of the Mishkan where the Spirits of HaShem לשמה dwell within that structure as the נמשל revelation of השם — לא בשמים היא; meaning the revelation of the Torah לשמה, by definition excludes God in the Heavens above. For example: when a Jew visits a tomb, he tucks in his tzitzit because mitzvot do not apply to the World to Come.

    Whereas שמות ג-ו. The verse שמות כ:ז serves as the most distinct fundamental contrast between doing all Torah mitzvot thereafter לשמה – the first commandment; from the 2nd negative commandment which this general negative commandment through the specific verb תשתחוה which most essentially means “do not believe” expressed through the “metaphor” – bow down. All av tuma avoda zarah theologies, creeds and/or belief systems most fundamentally require a stated belief in “other Gods”. The first commandment הוצאתיך ממצרים מבית עבדים stands upon the משנה תורה\common law/ precedent of the oath sworn at the brit of pieces. בראשית טו:יג — ויאמר לאברם ידע תדע כי גר יהיה זרעך בארץ לא להם ועבדו אותם וענו אותם ארבע מאות שנה. What makes this interesting, Israel was but 210 years in Egypt not four hundred years. חז”ל interprets the time difference to the Egyptian g’lut from the birth of Yitzak. Despite Yitzak never leaving the land of Canaan, Yitzak lived under the authority of foreign kings, no different from the post Babylonian exile where Judea existed as a ”banana republic” under the Persians, the Greek empires, both in Egypt and in Syria, and also by the Roman empire. The Talmud instructs that throughout the entire 2nd Temple period, Jews did not ever once keep the Yovel – the 50th year of freedom – declared throughout the land of Judea. Why?

    This declaration of Freedom fundamentally requires that Jews rule Judea as a free Independent nation! Hence the “g’lut” described at the brit cut between the pieces states 400 years, because starting with the birth of Yitzak “freedom” which requires that an Independent Great Sanhedrin Court in Jerusalem makes this Yovel declaration did not exist. During the approximately 110 years of Hashmonaim kings who ruled Judea following the successful revolt against the Syrian Greek empire, political and social anarchy, chaos, and Civil Wars defined this entire period. Herein explains how the Talmud instructs that during the entire period of the 2nd Temple, a span of about 450 years, Jews never once sanctified the mitzvah of the Yovel.

    Both the Nicene Creed and the conversion to being a Muslim center on a theological belief that a person must “buy” to be either a Xtian or Muslim. Hence “belief” functions as the יסוד of all av tuma avoda zara. The Talmud interprets the 2nd Sinai commandment specifically through 1. Assimilation and 2. Intermarriage.

    Examples of these two יסודות of av tuma avoda zarah: Penchas killing the head of the tribe of Shimon, the war against Midian where Balaam advised seducing Israel with wine and women; from here the חז”ל made Goyim wine forbidden to drink together with eating Goyim made bread. King Sholomo foreign wives – directly linked to his avoda zara. Ezra’s demand that Jews returning from Babylonian exile with foreign wives must divorce these women. Also when Jews built the 2nd Temple they rejected the assistance of the Shomronim imported by the Assyrian empire to replace the populations of the 10 Tribes with foreign alien conquered people who eventually “converted” to the God of the land out of fear for lions.

    Another contrast to the distinction between 400 and 210 years, the manner that the Reshonim scholars interpreted אנכי ה’ אלהיך, as the mitzva to know (לדעת) that there is one God. That He is the sole source of existence and authority. And that He is personally connected to (“…אשר הוצאתיך”) Israel alone. Only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai; Esav rejected the Torah – do not murder. And Yishmael rejected the Torah – do not steal. If a ger tzeddik refuses even one Torah commandment, the court which weighs his New Creation status rejects him or her. This fundamentally rejects the Pauline NT ‘grafted’ as utter nonsense.

    Another fundamental component of av tuma avoda zara – its belief system theologies or creeds etc seek to insert a substitutional belief system which the Torah fundamentally rejects. The Primary source מכילתא instructs acceptance of מלכות שמים, specifically as expressed in the tefilla from the Torah mitzvah of קריא שמע, which rabbi Yochanon extended to all sworn blessings contrasted by שבח Tehillem “praises”. The latter lacks שם ומלכות.

    The mitzvah of kre’a shma, like shabbat, or Moshiach – all wisdom Torah commandments which require k’vanna. This latter abstract term, understood as the dedication of one or more of the 13 Oral Torah “spirits” which define the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. רוח הקודש not words, like the word אלהים which the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים called the Golden Calf. Time-oriented commandments the purpose of observance of “ALL” Torah and Talmudic commandments and mitzvot – according to how the B’HaG learns. Contrast the Sefer HaMitzvot of assimilated Rambam whose book compares to storing eggs by the dozen; he restricts all the תרי”ג mitzvot limited to positive and negative commandments which do not require the wisdom which dedicates a Oral Torah spirit as defined through Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar.

    Virtually all rabbinic Jewish authorities throughout the ‘Golden Age’ Spain, duplicated the infidelity of the T’zeddukim as defined through the Hanukkah lights. Rambam serves as the exposed example. But assimilation and intermarriage defined the curse of the 2nd Sinai commandment which resulted in Jewish Civil Wars and forced expulsions from virtually all European countries; specifically England, France, the German kingdom, Spain, and the late 19th Century Czarist mass expulsion of Jews from Russia prior to the Bolshevik revolution.

    Assimilated Rambam replaced the inductive logic kabbalah of Rabbis Hillel, Akiva, Yishmael – which interprets Halacha; and Yossi HaGalil’s “32 Middot” which interprets Aggada — all collectively included under the umbrella known as פרדס inductive reasoning which defines the revelation of the 13 tohor middot of Horev post sin of the Golden Calf abomination. The Rambam organized his Yad halachic code in the same manner he did his Sefer HaMitzvot – into rigid Greek philosophy deductive syllogism logic. This fundamentally profanes דברים יב:ל,לא — do not ask how Goyim worship their Gods that I may do likewise. Roman statute laws – decreed by government authorities do not compare nor resemble judicial rulings which have the power to re-interpret (Legislative Review) all laws imposed by kings, Senates or other cult of personality authorities – Caesar for example embraced the idea that he lived as the son of God.

    Yet assimilated Rambam organized his Yad which directly duplicated the method of both Greek and Roman statute law! Rambam failed to understand that Gemara halachot contained within a specific sugya of Gemara, חז”ל brought as בניני אבות precedents – akin to different witnesses unique perspectives – of a specific Mishnaic judicial ruling. The Rambam’s replacement theology, arbitrarily organized, based upon Greek logic, Gemara halachot independent of the Mishna – a fundamental error. Halachot from the Gemara do not stand upon their own feet any more than Reshonim comments made upon the Talmud. Once the Talmud sealed – this Primary Source – forever separated from temporary Reshonim or thereafter secondary or tertiary sources.

    Reshonim opinions do not and cannot permanently define sealed masoret primary sources. Reshonim by definition existed in cursed g’lut. The language מצרים based upon the above mentioned 400 years in a foreign land – לאו דוקא. G’lut Jews – as slaves – cannot do mitzvot לשמה. Therefore the temporary need that g’lut Jewry experienced at the height of the barbaric Dark Ages does not apply to the Independent Jewish state achieved post the ’48 and ’67 Wars of National Independence. Anymore than the UN has a mandate to determine the borders of a Palestinian state after David Ben Gurion declared the national Independence of Israel.

    The מדרש which references (ספרי / מכילתא traditions about עשו וישמעאל), it seems to me directly invalidates any and all belief systems whose theologies promote a Monotheistic Universal God, which the assimilated Rambam openly embraced with both his minority Reshon interpretation of 7 mitzvot applicable to all Goyim in all lands together with his permission that Jews can daven tefillah in Mosques. The god of Israel only the 12 tribes accepted. But even that, according to rabbi Akiva’s interpretation that the Wilderness Generation has no portion in the World to Come. Therefore the god of Israel, a local tribal god and not a Monotheistic Universal God which the theologies of both church and mosque worship. In like manner, בראשית-ברית אש means oath alliance sworn לשמה. This interpretation of the סודות of the word בראשית (a Pardes logic), does not mean “covenant” anymore than the word ONE in the opening verse of kre’a shma refers to Monotheism.

    The language שם ומלכות does not refer to acceptance of any “king”. Rather the burden to direct the Yatzir Ha’tov tohor middot to rule the Yatzir Ha’ra middot within the heart – as rabbi Yechuda defines בכל לבבך within the language of kreat shma. כונה a wisdom commandment stands separate from the toldot positive and negative Torah commandments which do not require k’vanna.

    Post the Rambam induced – his משנה תורה – Tzedukim Civil War wherein they sought to convert Jerusalem into a Greek polis, all Reshonim and later rabbinic authorities wrote their commentaries upon the halachic codes, not limited to the כסף משנה statute law commentary but inclusive of all commentaries written on the common law codes of the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and Baalei Tosafot – following the ירידות הדורות-Rambam “domino effect” where in later rabbinic authorities confuse T’NaCH/Talmudic\Midrashim common law which learns from פרדס logic precedents to the alien imported statute law codes which pretend that Gemara and later Reshonim opinions – like as define both the Tur and Beit Yosef commentaries – determine religious halachic decrees.

    The framers of the Mishna and Gemara wrote their works as a model when Jews reconquered the homelands from the Roman barbarians and achieved an Independent Jewish Sanhedrin common law court system which alone possesses the power to declare the Yovel. Even the RambaN in his famous commentary to the Chumas teaches that g’lut Jews cannot keep Torah mitzvot! Glut Jews observe these mitzvot so they do not forget what it means to establish the chosen Cohen society in the reconquered land of Canaan.

    “מלך העולם” (standard ברכה language) compares to the twice repeated תמיד מעשה בראשית in the opening שחרית kria shema blessings. The term מלאכה close to מלאכים referenced within this first blessing. The wisdom creation story משל requires the Pardes דיוק which makes the required נמשל; wisdom commandment/time-oriented commandments create from nothing (יש מאין) the chosen Cohen people. This interpretation of the purpose for all wisdom Av time-oriented commandments fundamentally rejects the Goyim notion which continually slanders Jews as an inferior race – made famous by the לאו דווקא Nazi barbarians.

    The טיפש פשט literalism that God created the world in 6 days and rested upon the 7th: 1. fails to discern wisdom commandments/time-oriented commandments (like as did the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot code). 2. That is the “רוחהקודש” k’vanna of these mitzvot which תמיד מעשה בראשית creates the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot from generation to generation. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai, inclusive of the Book of בראשית. The טיפש פשט that reads the Torah in a historical chronological order fails to grasp that the revelation of judicial common law stands upon Pardes/middot precedents, and therefore has no fixed order. For example: the twice repeated עשרת הדברות – in point of fact never commanded in this rigid Code of Hammurabi format.

    Following the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment Israel feared for their lives and demanded that Moshe make the aliya and receive the rest of the Torah! Why does the Torah then repeat the עזרת דבורות? Torah common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents! The עזרת דבורות “remember” the 10 plagues whereby the god of Israel judged the Gods of both Egypt and later Canaan in the days of Yehoshua the prophet.

    In like manner assimilated Rambam stands virtually alone, even among Rishonim sources, when he poskins halacha from Aggadic sources like his 7 mitzvot bnei noach narishkeit. Goyim never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. Violation of the 7 mitzvot – the Talmud classifies as a Capital Crime. Only a Sanhedrin court can judge capital crimes. The jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courts limited, no different than the Yovel, to within the borders of an Independent Jewish state in the land of Canaan. Therefore the 7 mitzvot bnai noach referred to in masechet Sanhedrin can only refer to gere toshav which the Torah distinguishes from na’cree/Canaani\Shomronim.

    G’lut Jews by definition cannot grasp Pardes middot. The Reshonim Universally failed to affix דרוש\פשט to Aggadic sources in the Shas and רמז/סוד to the halachic portions of the Shas. The local god of Israel limited only to Israel because Moshe sent as a מלאך to Egypt based upon HaShem who remembered the oaths sworn to the Avot. The chosen Cohen seed learns directly from Sarah who commanded Avraham to cast out the bondwoman and her son, that only Yitzak would inherit the Cohen brit faith. Neither the NT nor Koran once brings the word ברית. Covenant does not mean brit. Because to swear a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות and neither books of avoda zara ever bring רוח הקודש Name but rather sin of Golden Calf word translations. The opening verse of the gospel of John – and the word is God. Utterly false to declare: The נמשל never removes God from being בורא ומלך על כל העולם. No man can grasp the Divine anymore that any ant can comprehend human civilizations! The Mishna teaches this in a strong warning: those who contemplate matters “above them”, “beneath them”, or “behind them” – better that, such persons never born.

    “גלות Jews cannot grasp פרדס” … just as slaves cannot own property, based upon remembering the slavery of Par’o and Egypt. Rabbi Akiva, Yishmael lived under Roman tyranny occupation. This Tannaic Masoret of Pardes serves to amplify the k’vanna of the 13 tohor רוח הקודש middot of Horev – following the sin of the Golden Calf.

    Rashi serves as witness. His Chumash commentary validates Torah common law through his blending of דרוש\פשט. He lived during the Xtian obliteration of the Jews of Germany on their way to duplicate that same obliteration of Jews under Arab rule during the 1st Crusades. Therefore, he limited his Talmudic commentary primarily to a dictionary-like definition of obscure terms. This forced his grandchildren – the Baali Tosafot – to correct his commentary to the Talmud. Rashi feared, as the later public burning of the Talmud in Paris 1242 proved the Goyim’s hatred of Jews. He therefore wrote his Talmudic commentary which concealed the Aggadic דרוש\פשט axis of Pardes inductive logic limited to his Chumash commentary to prevent the church barbarians from discovering how to learn Talmudic common law.

    The God of Israel always local. Elie Wiesel “Where was God” throughout the Shoah. Equally applies to where was JeZeus during the Shoah or where was Allah during the Nakba of both ’48 and ’67 Arab defeats which failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and accomplish the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East. The Torah limits “אמונה” strictly and only to צדק צדק תרדוף – based upon the oppression of the court of Par’o who withheld the necessary straw but condemned the Hebrew slaves for their laziness. No Goyim court, not the court of Par’o or the court in any g’lut Goyim lands ever once force the church or mosque authorities to stand trial for genocide or war crime as did the ICC which Israel never signed the Rome Agreement yet nonetheless attempted to impose its jurisdiction and declare the Israeli PM a war criminal post the Oct7th 2023 UNWRA & Hamas massacree of over 1300 Jews and the Red Cross failure to even once visit stolen Israelis held in torture tunnels for 2 years!

    The error “God is never geographically limited”, fails to account for the Cohen lands of Canaan, which limits the inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. דברים לו:יח – הסתר פנים restricted to the Life\Death – Blessing/Curse interpretation of the first two Sinai commandments. Ruling the land of Canaan with judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews to restore the brit alliance among our people which stands shalom upon the יסוד of trust … clearly limited like the example of the Yovel.

    “צדק צדק תרדוף” the most essential defining comprehension of Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar of faith. This utterly contradicts the NT alien import of belief in a Roman messiah as god concept. Or the Koran notion that prophets sent to all nations who never accepted the Torah at Sinai; starting with the Koran replacement of Yishmael for Yitzak at the akedah. Bnai Brit common law courts have the Torah faith obligation to pursue righteous justice among our brit allied people.

    The בראשית comprehension of מלוא כל הרץ כבודו — לה’ הארץ ומלואה learns from the precedent of the flood of Noach. The floods did not reach the oath-sworn lands of Canaan. צדק defines the obligation of the oath brit faith within the Cohen inheritance lands of Canaan. Goyim courts do not compare or resemble Sanhedrin courts. The latter common law courts with the Torah constitutional mandate to make משנה תורה-legislative review of any and all laws imposed by the 12 Tribal governments of the Republic and/or the Central government/king in Jerusalem. These courts – “lateral courts”. Goyim courts, vertical courts; where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and prosecuting attorneys. The Torah refers to this latter court system through the negative commandment which prohibits judges from accepting bribes. Torah Sanhedrin courts, limited strictly and only to the Independent Cohen nation within conquered Canaan.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Emergency Bilderberg 2026: MI6 DG Meets To Discuss WWIII Under Trump’s Nose in Washington DC. The Bristol Politics Show, presented by Tony Gosling – NOT The BCfm Politics Show - April 10, 2026

    […] To the peoples of the world, to thinkers, to scholars, and to those who believe in justice: A specter now haunts the conscience of humanity—the return of predatory power— and it shall no l…. The immediate dismantling of all US military installations in the region. Formal admission of […]

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.