Two Occupations

6 Nov

Two Occupations


            As someone who has witnessed the humiliations daily endured by Palestinians living decade after decade under ‘occupation’ the word occupation was for me an inalterably dirty word. I was especially conscious of occupation, especially prolonged occupation of the sort that Israel has imposed on Palestine as synonymous with ‘abuse’ and ‘oppression,’ having just completed intense discussions between leading Israeli and Palestinian voices for peace at an LSE workshop presided over by Mary Kaldor and Lakhdar Brahimi that seemed to have a single Archimedean point of consensus: ‘End the Occupation.’ Personally, I was not so content with such an outcome as it tended to narrow the Palestinian agenda to a kind of ‘land for peace’ formula, ignoring the plight of five million or so territorially dispossessed Palestinians living as refugees or exile, often enduring intolerable situations of vulnerability and deprivation that has continued for generations.


And then yesterday I visited ‘OCCUPY LONDON’ at the monumentally beautiful St. Paul’s Cathedral (#OccupyLSX) with some of the extraordinary young people who are making it happen, and quite possibly inventing a better future that seemed to be being enacted before my eyes. Ten days earlier I had a similar experience of exhilaration and hope after visiting Zuccotti Park (#OccupyWallSt) in New York City, witnessing a seemingly chaotic array of innovative synergies finding their common ground in nonviolently opposing what seems wrong in our society, economy, and state and envisioning and insisting upon what might be better, indeed much better. And what I took away is different from what I came with: I left these convivial spaces with an experience of joyful occupation. Of course, the joyful does not cancel out the dismal with respect to occupations, but it shows us that language is alive, grows with experience, and that parallel meanings can coexist even if the realities evoke contradictory ethical and political responses.


But also I had the further awakening through a conversation in one of the hospitality tents just outside St. Paul’s with a radiant young Indian woman. She was excited by what was happening around her, but was also worried that the goals of emancipation could not be achieved without new words clearly expressive of the vision of those gathered at these occupation sites. She was particularly concerned about the use of ‘democracy,’ which she felt had been spoiled by the shallowness and unrepresentative nature of her lived experience in democratic societies, and her disillusionment with political parties, campaigns, and elections, which remain the pillars of ‘democratic’ legitimacy. Even though the activists in the tents and on the steps of the cathedral tried to make clear their commitment to revolutionary change by speaking of ‘real democracy’ as gauged by accountability, transparency, participation, equality, justice, and human security in public arenas of decisions. As we spoke I wondered to myself, ‘was she asking too much?’ And then I thought, ‘without asking for the impossible there is no prospect of achieving the possible.’


During the conversation I tried my best to be responsive, although the assignment she gave me far exceeded my capabilities. To keep the conversation moving I asked timidly at one point ‘would you be more comfortable with livable politics?’ She smiled softly, obviously unconvinced, and so I tried again, ‘what about convivial politics?’ She liked this suggestion a bit better, or so it seemed, maybe appreciating my effort, but these words still did not capture for her the originality of what she was experiencing and desiring. Even though I disappointed her, I felt that we parted as friends for life. Such is the convivial atmosphere of magnetic energy that fills these occupied spaces with a contagious immediacy of hope.


My friend, Shimri, a core participant of the London movement, a vibrant personality of proven commitment, having spent two years in Israeli jails because he refused to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces, is totally preoccupied with what he labels as ‘global democracy,’ and was both my guide at London Occupy site, but also one of three lead organizers of the LSE workshops. He hopes to democratize the United Nations, while helping to light bonfires of expectation in all 900 tent cities around the world, and with his infectious energy he imparts a sense of plausibility to even the most distant horizons of desire. Shimri explains to me the process at work at St. Paul’s as total democracy: daily assembly meetings, no leaders, everyone present can veto any decision, volunteer for any task that is to done, all are entitled to speak, and a Wikipedia spirit of taking a variety of steps without any central guidance that give those participants food to eat, books to read (there is a donated lending library in one of the tents), lectures to attend. There is no hierarchy, no ego, no blueprint. It is a radical atmosphere that suggests what the inner reality of the Paris Commune might have been like, or differently, the optimism of the early counterculture in America during the 1960s. But things are different in 2011: above all, these occupations borrow extensively from the heroics of Tahrir Square, and more generally are a sequel to the Arab Spring, and there is more sense of unmanageable challenge associated with the failures of existing crisis managers (it happened that the disastrous G-20 meeting in Cannes was happening over this very weekend). This debt to Egypt is overtly acknowledged in different ways in London. For instance, Shimri has a big sign in front of his tent with the words ‘Global Mubarak,’ and across from the cathedral is a London street sign that looks like the real thing,

with the words ‘Tahrir Square.’ And in its way, it was the real thing. This was Tahrir Square! At least for now! In important respects Occupy London LSK also spreace across the ocean from #OccupyWallSt, and in substance resembles the greater preoccupation of the EuroAmerican protests with the failures of the economy rather than the oppressive burdens on the populace associated with autocratic rule. In this regard it is helpful not to think too literally about the Global Mubarak metaphor. Whatever else it makes the transnational link, and defers to a flow of influence from South to North, which is itself evidence of a decolonizaing of the colonial mind, a process that still has a long way to go!  


I came away with many reflections, but above all the fervent conviction that almost all of us would be far better off if these young people filling the squares around the world were put in charge of our collective future. I for one would rather live in their world than in the current G-20 world. For sure, there would be an end to war and militarism, the human footprint on the planet would be lightened, consumerism repudiated and defetishized, poverty would be overcome, voting would be done without taking national boundaries too seriously, accountability would be determined by a rule of law that treated equals equally. I also realized that this brave confrontation with the established order might yet be ruthlessly crushed if our current angels of entropy become threatened, and decide to turned loose their hooligan legions., recalling the bloody end of the Paris Commune or the sad fate of the idealistic Soviets that ironically were among the first victims of the Russian Revolution. But this look back at dashed hopes in the past was my momentary daytime nightmare that vanished from consciousness as soon as I awoke and looked around me at the bright eyes of those standing close by.


I will save some other commentary for a later time, and only write now that part of what was happening in these civic zones of engagement was the revalidation of the utopian imagination, a necessary ingredient of any transformative politics. If we are to find ‘solutions’ we all need quickly to liberate our imaginations from the tyranny of ‘the feasible.’ The ‘realists’ presently holding the reins of power are unknowingly inhabiting realms of fantasy while the train of history approaches the station named DOOM. The young people are coming to admit this grim realization, and for this the rest of us can be thankful, enough so to allow ourselves the momentary privilege of hope.


Also, it is important that this first global dispersed expression did not start in the West. Even after the collapse of colonialism, the West has run the world. This is beginning to change with America’s decline and Europe’s muddle. That the Arab popular movements should awaken the underclasses, the 99%, in the West is one of the strangest geopolitical occurrences of the last hundred years.

Almost anywhere else on the planet would have seemed a more plausible staging ground for the reinvention of transformative politics in a global setting. It also illustrated the irrelevance of 9/11 and Islamophobia to the priorities and tactics of globalization-from-below, or what might be called ‘moral globalization.’



8 Responses to “Two Occupations”

  1. Joshua Blakeney November 6, 2011 at 8:32 pm #

    Excellent piece Professor Falk. I myself have been grappling with the semantics of the word “occupation” having spent several days at Occupy Vancouver where a great number of British Columbia’s First Nations were present. For such Native Americans the “occupation” really goes back to 1492.

    It would seem fair to assert that we, the people, are actually reoccupying our public spaces which were illegitimately handed over to private companies. Perhaps, like the Palestinians, “decolonizing” is the most apposite verb to describe our resistance to the tyranny of theft-through-privatization.

    • Richard Falk November 7, 2011 at 4:40 am #

      Thanks, Joshua, if you quote please use modified text now posted on blog as there were a couple of mistakes in the original version. And keep up your own strong presence as a truth-seeker! With greetings, Richard

  2. Jan Oberg November 7, 2011 at 3:14 am #

    Oh, so you were in London, dear friend! It’s such a deeply human and encouraging comment. I have quoted the last para in a text of mine in the forthcoming TFF Newsletter. It’s so beautifully formulated and happened to meet some much simpler thoughts I was trying to express. I really look forward to the continuation – your own emphasis on the imagination, on the constructive is so much in line with the “new” TFF we are trying to shape these months…Thanks a lot, Richard!

    • Richard Falk November 7, 2011 at 4:37 am #

      Thanks, Jan. I wish that I could join more directly with you in relation to TFF, which has
      stood tall for so long! Please use the modified text of my post on the London/Israel occupation as the original had a couple of awkward mistakes, including saying in the opening para that Israel was imposing the occupation on itself. The corrected text is now posted.

      Warmly from Montreal

      • Anthony J. Hall November 7, 2011 at 4:23 pm #

        The movement begins with the urge to “occupy” but, as we regain a sense of our collective empowerment, we will more and more inhabit our shared public spaces. As I see it urban camping is here to stay as we create communal alternatives to the parliaments, legislatures and congressional assemblies that have provided cover for the military, extractive and disinformation activities empowering the .01%.

        The globalization during the American Fall of the Arab Spring has set in motion currents of self-determination that will continue to transform the world’s political culture. The goal of ending the occupation of Palestine along with the dispossession of the Palestinians remains a prominent feature of our global movement for the decolonization of people and peoples.

      • Richard Falk November 8, 2011 at 6:44 am #

        Thanks for this message, which is realistically optimistic and attentive to the ongoing injustice experienced daily by the Palestinian people.

  3. monalisa November 8, 2011 at 10:15 am #

    Dear Richard,
    your last essays and the poem are very touching.

    I think it was already high noon that people got onto streets.

    The vote in favor for the Palestinians showed clearly that far too many countries are aware what is going on and want to put an end to it.

    And the same accounts for people in different countries/places as many politicans are veiling their actions with a self-righteousness which people don’t really accept.
    They see the lies and veils of their wrong doings.

    People are more informed as a decade ago and if politicans aren’t aware of it they will see the result – maybe not immediately but in due time.

    To curb the information flow will not be possible – too many people/countries are involved.

    The crime done to the Palestinians right from the start while founding Israel was apparent.
    However, especially Europeans, Germans and Austrians, didn’t want to see it. Point.
    I think there is no excuse for seeing crimes done and not rising the voice and trying to bring it to an halt as that means becoming implicated in that very crimes which are committed. Point.

    Hopefully we will see some positive results of all these actions.


    • Richard Falk November 8, 2011 at 12:27 pm #

      Your warmth and insight are always so welcome, and give me the encouragement of solidarity despite the distance that separates us. At least now I know why I visited Graz a few years ago!
      Take lots of care, Monalisa!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: