World Order After 1945, After Vietnam War, and After Second Coming of Trump

14 Responses to “World Order After 1945, After Vietnam War, and After Second Coming of Trump”

1. 

   Kata Fisher February 3, 2026 at 11:25 pm #

   Dear Professor Falk,

   What they did to Ali / Eli Cohen and his Family – they most likely did exactly the same thing to Epstein. They most likely forced him to do similar / same things as Ali / Eli Cohen. I saw documentary about him / Eli. Epstein most likely got his beginnings from the Maxwells father, and that whole thing that was taking place is not in the capacity of a single person like him, or Ms. Maxwell — they were most likely doing same things as Eli Cohen – Wikipedia

   The whole thing is a sad story that shows just how incompetent and inhuman some of those people are in diabolical intellect and ingenuity, especially with Epstein case.

   They either try to kill or compromise the heads of the state. The heads of the states should not come to NY – UN, at all, for meetings, or gathering — and they should do the whole gathering elsewhere. I doubt that they will be safe and not compromised in some way.

   They will be always illegally targeted, in some way. They do not see or understand all grave dangers to them, and their governance.

   It is important to keep them safe in these diabolical circumstances.  I do not believe that they should be coming to NY/ UN gatherings, at all. As long as these current situations are going on – they all need to only commit to must necessary things, and only there where they will not be compromised, harassed.

   Are there alternative places elsewhere that can replace NY/ UN gatherings and those be moved from US, for the time being?

   That is for the sake of the Head of the States, and their custodianship safeguarding.

   I also feel terrible for Israelis that they are in grave issues that they were and are, right now. It is a terrible thing — I doubt that they can be helped in any meaningful way.

   K. F.

   Reply
   • 

     Richard Falk February 5, 2026 at 10:26 am #

     Poignant and informed in your special way. Thanks Kata for sharing your
     understanding. Warmly, Richard

     Reply
2. 

   mosckerr February 4, 2026 at 3:47 am #

   A Classic example of how the heart and soul of Torah gets lost in Goyim tits on a boar hog translations.

   “There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem…” In Acts 5:16, the Greek phrase perix tō Ierousalēm simply refers to, nearby towns, surrounding villages, local communities in Judea — a geographical description of the region immediately around Jerusalem in the early 1st Century. No manuscript—Greek, Latin, Syriac, Coptic, or otherwise—contains anything resembling “Fort Worth” in Acts 5:16.

   The phrase “round about unto Jerusalem” simply means the towns and villages surrounding Jerusalem in the 1st century. Fort Worth founded in 1849, almost 1,800 years after Acts was written. The Book of Acts written before any of the gospels were ever penned.

   There is no ancient place named Fort Worth anywhere in Judea, Samaria, or the Roman Empire. The Book of Acts written before any of the 4 gospel Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion “counterfeits”. That the church fathers organized their NT fraud with the gospel followed by Acts as corrupt as Fort Worth!

   The earliest gospel of Mark written in Rome, perhaps prior to the destruction of Herod’s temple abomination. One Roman guard famously quoted as saying, “Its better to be Herod’s dog than a family member!”

   If the Book of Acts was written in 62 CE then it predates any gospel of Mark “speculation”. Gossip narratives and speculation do not replace eye witness first hand information. Hence debates upon the NT as “historical” evidence as false as a mad hatter. Historians have no clear evidence one way or the other. Such a debate clearly separates the emphasis of the T’NaCH Jewish literature vs. the Xtian NT literature. Prophets command mussar they to not teach history. The NT fraud requires a physical historical man JeZeus. Otherwise this fraud religion collapses like a house of cards.

   Acts ends with Paul alive. No mention of Paul’s death. No mention of the Temple’s destruction. Therefore Acts was written before 70 CE, possibly around 62 CE. But all this 2000+ years later speculation fails to address the main point. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. Rava for example teaches that Job existed as a fictional imaginary man. The point of the Book of Job, to teach the mussar of g’lut and redemption from g’lut. This places the Book of Job on par and similar to the Book of Sh’mot – the 2nd Book of the Written Torah. The attempts by “scholars” thousands of years after the fact to argue that Mark preceded Acts – simply Pie in the Sky speculative nonsense.

   The merit behind interpreting the NT as the equivalent of the Russian secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander employed to justify the pogroms of the late 19th Century …

   Just as similar speculation that Paul served as an Agent Provacateur of Rabban Gamliel of the Great Sanhedrin. Jews in Judea and Alexandria Egypt locked in brutal and bitter war. Alexandria with its huge library burnt to the ground prior to the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination.

   Why the reference ‘Temple abomination’? Starting with the avoda zara of king Shlomo who first built the Temple abomination of avoda zara. The prophet Natan forbade king David to copy how Goyim civilizations worshipped their Gods. Just as Rehovoam ignored the advice of Shlomo’s advisors, so too Shlomo ignored the council of the prophet Natan. The Beit HaMikdash not a building of wood and stone idolatry but rather the establishment of the Federal Sanhedrin common law legal court system!

   T’NaCH “wisdom” literature serves to “understand” Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. The historical Books of Kings, a prophetic work, does not teach theology (the Xtian interpretation) but rather it give a big picture contexts to the Books of the Prophets! This qualifies as כלל פרט according to the middot of rabbi Yishmael. Mussar does not mean “ethical instruction”. The latter an entirely false parameter of prophesy. Mussar defines the k’vanna of the 13 tohor middot Oral Torah revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews translated the revelation of the Spirit Name who fills the Yatzir Ha’Tov heart – the נמשל of the Mishkan משל.

   The church fathers read the Book of Sh’mot as history rather than as prophetic mussar. The Torah speaks in the language of Man, it instructs mussar through משל\נמשל model/paradigm. The Creation story of the Universe instructs through this משל of 6 days time, to teach the mussar נמשל of time-oriented commandments wherein “time” understood as “wisdom” – משל\נמשל.

   Hence the church Old Testament New Testament propaganda falsely conceals the open fact that the literature of the T’NaCH radically different from the revisionist history propaganda of the letters of Paul and the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander forgery. Both Paul introduced in Acts served as an Agent Provacateur to undermine the false messiah Roman propaganda of Mark’s JeZeus. Paul by declaring brit melah as a void Torah commandment undermined the influence of the Roman false messiah gospel narrative prior to the outbreak of the great Jewish revolt in 66 CE. Paul traveled to Rome to inject a form of monotheism into Roman polytheistic society. With the purpose to undermind the foundations of Roman civilization; to crack the “Ethical Containment Force” of Roman soceity.

   Paul’s propaganda aimed to promote Civil War in Rome based upon Yehuda Maccabee’s propaganda which publicly declared Judea’s loyalty to the “real” king of the Syrian Greek empire! This Pauline propaganda based upon the generic כלל: “If it aint broke don’t fix it.” Obviously this modern rendition seeks to emphasize that Torah as a common law precedent based legal system shaped how ancient Jewish civilizations revolted against the Syrian Greek and Roman empires.

   The scholarship of ancient texts has nothing to do with a Greek Athens democratic model. The revelation of the Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic sh’itta starkly contrasts with ancient Greek philosoplers, specifically Plato and Aristotle’s deductive logic of static reasoning. פרדס logic a fluid logic similar to Calculus varables. Whereas Greek logic deductive & static, similar to Euclid’s plane geometry.
   ___________________________________
   If the T’NaCH, most essentially mussar and not history, what—if anything—do you think gets “lost in the translation”, similar to Fort Worth – when Conservative, Reform Judaism start defending T’NaCH on historical or archaeological grounds, instead of on its power as prophetic mussar?
   _______________________________________________
   This question delves straight into the Rambam Civil War? During the Dark Ages, the roads built by the Roman empire had totally collapsed. People stopped traveling distances due to the risks of being attacked and murdered. Interstate commerce totally collapsed. Jewish communities scattered across the face of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, how could they maintain some type of standardized culture and customs which would prevent Jews from assimilating to the dominant cultures and customs of the peoples wherein they lived as a despised refugee minority populaiton which had no rights???

   Scholars starting with the B’HaG and Rif organized Talmudic common law into something new and all together different than what the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud originally envisioned. Originally the T’NaCH organized mussar middot into a Common law, precedent based, middot system which compared one NaCH sugya to similar NaCH sugyot which contained the identical set of Oral Torah middot. By aligning two or more sugyot which had the same set of Oral Torah middot (‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו), this comparison of sugyot called דרוש; this alignment of similar (precedent based middot) served as something like the rear and front sights of a rifle which permitted the “sniper” to kill a target down range.

   This “kill” משל has the “k’vanna” נמשל. Hence the later Talmud based upon the משל of a loom which has opposing warp vs. weft threads. The k’vanna of the Framers of the Talmud, to create a literature of Great Sanhedrin judical court room rulings (the Mishna) together with its prosecution and defense attorney precedent debates (the Gemara). Therefore the Framers of the Talmud wrote this ancient text to serve as the judicial model for the future time when Jews would slaughter the Roman occupiers of Judea and re-establish Jewish National Independence like as occurred in 1948 and again in 1967 CE.

   Do Jews feel anger for Xtian and Muslim war crimes perpetrated against low hanging Jewish refugee easy victims. Jews no different than any other Human being abused by tyrrants. But the bottom line for the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmudic literature, not to promote Jewish anger and hatred against our oppressor cruel Par’o like enemies; any more than the Book of Sh’mot promotes anger and hatred against the Egyptians! In point of fact the Torah directly commands a negative commandment which forbids Israel to hate either specifically Egyptians and Esau in general. Esau the metaphor for Xtian Europeans.
   ____________________________________
   What gets lost when Jews defend Tanakh as history instead of prophetic mussar?
   The substance of allTanakh literature: to create an oath brit alliance which obligates all generations of Israel to dedicate tohor middot in how we interact and exchange with our people; middot-driven, common-law consciousness that “understands” time as wisdom – most specifically as time-oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar\interpretations of the k’vanna of tohor Oral Torah middot. And g’lut-exile interpreted through משל/נמשל – blessing/curse Torah oath brit. And not through the lens of Greek proof or Xtian biography revisionist history or substitute theology NT or Koran Gods.

   The day and night difference which for ever separates the Hebrew T’NaCH from either the Xtian NT or Arab Koran – translating poetry into prose — keeps the words, buth the rhythm, the soul, the imperative to “understand” (like from like distinctions) through mussar prophetic tohor middot – lost in the sophomoric translations. Gone, like Fort Worth in Acts.

   Reply
   • 

     Kata Fisher February 6, 2026 at 11:19 pm #

     Dear Professor Falk,

     Always

     A thinly little Note:

     They never had intentions to write A New Testament, – or the Gospels, as we call/ know them today.

     Luke wrote a lengthy trustworthy letter to trustworthy Theophilus (in essence), and he would have been in Fulfilment of the Promise, receiving life-giving Spirit.  

     So, too, with Paul.

     Letters were written by Paul to the Churches, or dictations to the writers who helped Paul write the letters to the Churches.  They are Pauline writings that have been lost to the Church – or have been hidden most likely (by the Latine/ West Church), if so.   Church in Corinth turned especially corrupt, and they themselves may have had destroyed Pauline writings that they did not like after their leadership withered away, and all had remained of them were cults or sects – due to the Corinthians in abuse of the Ancient Order while Paul was alive, and wrote the letters to them to correct that, and after Paul.

     Both Paul and Luke give reference to the Church in Jerusalem, whom they have received everything from.

     Then passing on of that continuation.

     Luke for example has intentions to help Theophilus understand what has been achieved among them.  In Paul’s case, it is the “Good News” (his message) that he has received directly from the Church in Jerusalem, and somewhat immediately after, or parallel to Paul’s vision in Damascus.

     First and Second Generation of the Church / the Way, and or Christian’s sects wrote the letters to each other. Church and the Sects wrote the Letters to each other.  

     They have been considering to be in fulfilment and continuation of the Old Testament.

      The critics saw them as Jewish sects, originally, even at their time.

     The authenticity and accuracy of the ancient writings were 100% since any falsification (by dictations and/or translations) in Roman Empire was accounting to the death penalty.

     They wrote letters, and they wrote those letters in their (to us now a historical context), period.

     To this point in time, the main key is to understand the Ancient Writers, what they were writing, and in their historical context in which they were writing and living.

     The main issue was (and still is to prove?)  whether something was fulfilled and was being fulfilled among them – or not.

     Where are they all fraud? How many possibly could be fraud in that time and age – with their claims that something among them was fulfilled, and is being fulfilled, all together?

     Even Luke mentions his carful investigations of the events, and they only Credited validity to the Church in Jerusalem, even in their time and age. Luke certainly did, and so did Paul.

     Then with that – somewhat it becomes the second issue, the issue of their validity/trustworthiness of the writers (themselves and all other that were circling around in Lukes and Paul’s Time) , AND/OR the issue of the preservation of their letters (writing, rewriting, hiding, destroying parts of the letters – or entire letters, all together).  

     Another factor for contemporary people to consider:  Ancient, they all fled prosecutions and things were confiscated from them – they fled on foot with whatever they could have, and with whatever they could hide, AND whatever they could save.

     So, may they have, or may they not have the letters written on one, or several parchments.  What remained together, what was lost/destroyed and/or hidden by the generations / years that followed?

     John while on Patmos – in his case of writings down – was told that nothing can be added or taken away from that what he received by the Spirit (as the Church). This part of the Church writings is prophetic in Nature.

     With that,

     Those letters. All of the Letters / writings — That history. They’re and the entire human continuation/s from their time to this one is human reality.

     I used many contemporary terms.

     So, grave abuses of what was fulfilled among them, has been received by them, and how was preserved and passed down by everyone else.

     Human nature:

     When could they ever understand the writer/s? Their own and others?

     Or when could they ever receive the Letters of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Letters? 

     And why, and why not? Obviously, they were braking Spiritual Laws with all Powerplays and dramas that they worshiped above anything else, even in that day.

     Examples such as Drusilla “Emesa,” who was involved with Felix, and Herodias and her offspring, raise further questions about the influence of historical figures on us, and their persistence of wickedness in OUR human history?

     Two spectacular set of tits – just for an example to our human history?

     Maybe not

     Drusilla “Emesa” – who most likely seduced Felix, or was seduced by Felix mast likely — and his third wife

     Maybe not

     Who was Herodias in the Bible?  And why her and her offspring were gravely wicked? That those femen were not wicked is definitely questionable.

     Seriously,

     and seriously,

     when could they ever receive the Letters of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Letters? 

     Do they understand their Writers in their own Time, and do they understand everyone else’s writers in their own times.

     Do they understand what they are doing in their own time? What a bizarrely evil thing that they all have committed and done. It is human reality that ca be observed — and noted, with or without consequence.

     Where is their Priest, the Prophet and King? What is going on?

     House of Israel is never house of David, and never will be – without David Himself, at all.

     David took his own sin and dope of curse upon himself, so that house and that offspring is free from it — but the curse and rebellion remained with obnoxious lay-people who could not repent among themselves, and in their own spirit.

     Since Ancient People and Ancient Spirit much has not changed, at all.

     K. F.

     Reply
     • 

       mosckerr February 7, 2026 at 7:40 pm #

       Middot define both T’NaCH and Talmud scholarship. Middot compare to notes on a music-sheet, based upon the Shabbat public reading of the Sefer Torah.

       Middot compare to notes on a music sheet, based upon the Shabbat public reading of the Sefer Torah. The Torah and NaCH prophets learn from the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf avoda zara where assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Israelites translated the “word” אלהים as a replacement for the revelation of the שם השם לשמה.

       Meaning all other Divine Names first introduced in the Book of בראשית refer to the vision of a God in the Heavens above. The Sinai revelation changed this spirituality unto the revelation of the שם השם לשמה who lives within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen people in this Earth below just as the משל “form” of the Mishkan-Sinai revelation teaches the mussar of the נמשל “substance” that the שם השם לשמה permanently resides upon the Earth below and not the Heavens above. דכתיב: דברים ל:יב – לא בשמים היא.
3. 

   Kata Fisher February 12, 2026 at 11:33 pm #

   I understand that self-preservation is most important, and Ten Commandments along with keeping the Sabath, and all Spiritual Laws is just what self-preservation is for Cohen Chosen people to this day, as always was. Arguing against Aaronic Priesthood, and Order of that is not possible –No one can successfully argue against any of that, even to this day. That is established and we can make a note on that.

   The Glory and Grace, and the revelation did certainly descend to the Sinai trough the Spirit.

   For the sake of the Aaronic Priesthood, make us understand why the Jewish state in Historical Palestine, and nothing else?

   I as a descendant of Bosnian Arabs and/or local to the region Goyim (non-Jews) and Roman Catholic who does not attend the Church in US due to the Grave abuse of the Ancient Church Order by the Lay-clergy of the American-Protestant-Catholicism who abuse Ancient Order (and Law of the Spirit) want to understand WHY by War, and WHY NOT by Spirit

   1. Jewish state in Historical Palestine?

   1. What is the Jewish State’s and/or state of Israel’s Plan (spiritual Plan) for the entire population, Jews and Non-Jews (immigrating and emigrating legally and illegally) within the ancient territories of the Historical Palestine and/or Kingdom of Israel and Judeah? Will the spiritual sloths rule them, and or kill them?
   2. Is and /or will the Jewish State’s and/or State of Israel’s be a spiritual sloth for Jews and non-Jews just as anyone else is a spiritual sloth for their own sheep and everyone else’s sheep’s?

   My understanding is that Aaronic Priesthood never was and would not be a spiritual sloth. However, why Jewish state? Why nothing else?

   Can we understand that?

   It Is not that I do not want to understand that — I want to understand it, but in actual facts.

   Everyone will be held accountable what they do with their own and everybody else’s herds of sheeplets.

   Is or is not the Aaronic Priesthood sufficient in the Territories in question? Is it right now, and will it be sufficient for their continuation?

   What about Human continuation (of the entire population) and human Rights? Rights of the little girls in forced marriages/rapes?

   What about diabolical cults and sects?

   Can everybody co-exist, and how?

   By inserting some civil-ecclesiastical laws? But which one? And/or Lawfully – or unlawfully?

   These are some difficult questions.

   K.F.

   Reply
4. 

   mosckerr March 5, 2026 at 6:53 am #

   A Now or Never “window of opportunity” favorable for the partition of Iraq and Iran to establish an Independent Kurdish State

   Kurdish Independence a now or never proposition. Russia tied down in Ukraine. China occupied with Taiwan and Japan + facing a domestic economic meltdown similar to Japan’s lost generation. The collapse of the Islamic revolution in Iran with a US/Israeli victory presents the best opportunity to partition Iran into an Independent Kurdish state.

   A US and Israel in the region could weaken Iranian influence, potentially emboldening Kurdish movements in Iraq into a unified Kurdish Republic partitioned from these two States. The proposition of Kurdish independence as a “now or never” opportunity quite compelling.

   The Kurds stand today as the largest stateless nation post WWI. Iraqi Kurdistan already has a recognized autonomous region with its own institutions. Rojava in northern Syria has had de facto self‑rule, though under constant military and diplomatic pressure. External arming of Kurdish groups in Iran is already being discussed. A unified Kurdish Republic carved from Iraq + Iran a best case scenario: a clean, US/Israel‑backed partition into a large, unified Kurdish state.

   The collapse of the USSR in 1991 and the hostility of the EU during President Trump’s first term, coupled by attempts by Pelosi and Biden to bring the Ukraine into the Nato alliance opens the possibility that President Trump might strike a deal to pull the US out of Nato in return for Putin’s support for an Independent Kurdish state.

   Long-standing defense treaties started under the Wilson government in the past Century. The ‘Art of the Deal’ where Russia would recognize an Independent Kurdish state in Iraq and Iran partitioned based upon the precedents of Poland partitioned. Long standing Arab/Muslim terrorism has its consequences. A new Independent Kurdish Republic would not sit directly upon any Russian border.

   Iraq and Iran failed states with years of internal anarchy and political chaos following the 1st and 2nd Gulf Wars. The initial partition of Iraq and Iran would leave a buffer zone between it and the borders of Turkey. Turkey did not fight the current Israel/US war with Islamic Iran. Consequently this partition does not concern nor involves Turkey. This partition no different than the British partition which established the Independence of Kuwait. That partition deprived Iraq access to the Sea.

   The comparison between U.S. membership in NATO and treaties with Indian Nations throughout the 19th century highlights important similarities in the legal framework by which the United States engages with international and domestic agreements. Article 5 of the NATO treaty commits members to collective defense, meaning an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. Post collapse of the USSR in 1991 terminates NATO based upon the collapse of the Warsaw Pact.

   Treaties made with Indian Nations similar to NATO treaties, these agreements. The precedent of the US Supreme Court vs Andrew Jackson ‘Trail of Tears’ stands. An international treaty does not compare to the basic law of the US Constitution. Despite the concept of treaties addressed in Article VI of the Constitution, the American Civil War determined in the case of the Commerce Clause also part of the US Constitution, that the Federal Government could regulate intra-state trade and commerce. The classic example: the SC Roe vs Wade ruling.

   Political branches can break treaties when they no longer serve strategic US interests. Only revisionist history classifies Indian nations as ‘domestic agreements’. Only later with the virtual extermination of the Indian tribes did these treaties become classified as ‘domestic agreements’.

   Trump 2.0 stands upon the foundation that foreign diplomacy operates on deception. European states failure to meet their required obligations to maintain the NATO alliance in good faith, also has undermined that post WWII treaty establishe by the Truman Administration. The Nato treaty does not compare to the 10 Commandments carved in stone.

   Nato a post WWII treaty that exists merely as water under the bridge. The founding Fathers opposed making entangling alliances with Europe. Native nations only treated as “domestic dependents nations” to support the US manifest destiny declarations. Indian state prior to the conquest of from Sea to Sea had their own militaries, economies, and alliances no different than do the European states – despite joining or leaving the EU alliance – today. For example: the US and Britain had a strong alliance during the two European Civil Wars euphanistically called WWI & WWII. The Soviet victory over the Nazis refers to that war as ‘the Great Patriotic War’!

   Trump Derangement Syndrome started with Russia-gate and the inside traitor Nancy Pelosi attempts to impeach the President. But a lot of water has flown under the bridge following the two assassination attempts upon the life of Trump. Trump 2016 faced a divided GOP with a very strong Neo Con “opposition”. Trump 2.0 leads the GOP. Power and interest ultimately decide whether Treaties endure or collapse. The U.S. has a long history of breaking solemn commitments when it chooses. Bottom line: post WWI the Allies failed to establish Kurdish Independence.

   Reply
   • 

     Richard Falk March 5, 2026 at 11:08 am #

     I commend this thoughtful extended comment, although I don’t agree with
     its positivity with respect to US militarism in the ME, as fashioning by
     Israel’s vision of regional hegemony. Kurds do deserve, as do Palestinians,
     the exercise of their long denied right of self-determination. Casting aside
     treaties and even international understandings is an example of hubris as the
     ancient Greeks understood and yet were victimized by its thralldom.

     What is needed to make ‘power’ compatible with ‘morality’ is not ‘strategic interests’
     but humility and empathy, both missing from Trump’s vocabulary and behavior.

     Reply
     • 

       mosckerr March 5, 2026 at 7:03 pm #

       Greetings Richard, pleasure to respond back to you. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion Czarist secret police forgery blood libel published to justify the Russian pogroms at the tail end of the Czarist 3 Century regime, they too argued that the tail wags the dog. LOL

       Israel, whether ancient or modern, its strategic diplomacy stands upon making strategic international alliances. בראשית\ברית אש/ראש בית\ב’ ראשית all these permutations of the first word of the Torah, imply some kind of “marriage” alliance. The translation of brit unto “covenant” by silly Goyim bible sophomoric translations … comparable to the Blood libels of the Middle Ages where the barbaric priests slandered Jews no different than Hillary Clinton and the MSM propaganda press slandered Trump – 3 years of Russia-gate lies.

       Anyone who knows about cutting a Torah alliance/brit which the silly Yo-yo church priests never hopped … knows that an alliance has its primary and secondary partners. For example: HaShem swore an oath alliance to each of the Avot that 1. they and only they would father the chosen Cohen people. 2. that their chosen Cohen seed – which by definition excluded both Yishmael and Esau – would inherit the “oath sworn lands”. In this oath sworn brit cut with the Avot, the lesser party to this oath alliance/brit the silly sophomoric bible churchmen translators 1. Never made the logical inference and inquired “What oath did each of the Avot swear back? A 2000+ year ooooooooooops. 2. These reactionary morons – addicted to slander – love to quote their apostle Paul: “you’re not under the law”, but fail to inquire and ask the basic question: “What differentiates T’NaCH and Talmud “common law” from Roman “statute law”. Another oooooooooooop bone head stupidity.

       Furthermore, the gospel “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” Roman forgery, it presumes to define prophesy as foretelling the future “fulfilled the words of the prophets”. While the Koran av tuma tells the lie that prophets sent to all nations and speak the tongue of the people there sent their unto to warn. LOL Moshe and Yonah both sent to Egypt and Assyria to Jewish oppressed exiled populations, and only secondarily to non brit Cohen Goyim. Why? Goyim never accept the oath brit revelation at Sinai, 1) Goyim lack the wisdom to discern between the Divine Names in בראשית from the Divine Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment. LOL אל שדי, אל, אלהים, האל all envision a God in the heavens above. Contrast the Sinai revelation of the שם השם לשמה — only לא בשמים היא. Hence rabbi Yechuda the Nassi of the Sanhedrin court interpreted the additional ב of לבבך\כם as the distinction which separates the Yatzir Ha-Tov from the Yatzir Ha-Ra. Why? Simple and to the exact point distinction which separates Sinai from how the Avot perceived the divine revelations; a Heaven vs Earth distinction; specifically defined through the Golden Calf word translation expressed through John 1:1. The Revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment Name — Spirit not word. Oooooooops LOL.

       My point: The US the only super-power on the Planet Earth following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Israel a new nation which won its National Independence twice in two separate wars: 1948 and 1967. To confuse a post WWII new nation with the victor of WWII LOL an equally OOOOOOOOOOOOOps error.
     • 

       mosckerr March 5, 2026 at 7:32 pm #

       That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic. Based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.
     • 

       mosckerr March 6, 2026 at 3:20 am #

       The Xtian ‘Word of God’ has no portion with Sinai

       The בראשית Divine Names אל שדי אלהים אל וכו stand apart from the revelation of the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Hence the Avot did not “know HaShem”. The Mishkan פרט teaches a profound משל which requires the generations to make the דיוק נמשל. The kabbalah-שכנה refers to rabbi Yechuda’s Yatzir Ha-Tov in his kre’a shma interpretation לבבך\כם; consistent with the dedication of Horev spirits/middot 13 followed up by Talmud Yerushalmi/Bavli middot 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, 13 Yishmael affixed to interpreting Gemara common law halachic precedents and HaGallil 32 middot/aggada – to re-interpret (משנה תורה) the language of the Mishna which Gemara common law serves to interpret as a mirror of courtroom witnesses who testify based upon their given “fixed” perspectives. Akin to the front-top-side views of a blue print.

       The theological abomination of Monotheism perverts the reality that each nation unique, because each nation worships its own national God. The 30 Year War a strong precedent. A T’NaCH source precedent, the permanent split between the kingdoms of Yechuda and Yisroel serve witness before the אלהים court. First the kingdom of Israel assimilated and embraced alien cultures and customs and abandoned the Oral Torah which serves to define the culture, customs, social practices which define the identity of the chosen Cohen people. Then Yechuda also worshiped other National Gods by embracing foreign cultures customs and forgetting and abandoning the revelation of the god of Sinai. Hanukkah serves witness. The Rambam serves as a prime example of how assimilation and intermarriage define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Herein explains the failure of Reshonim scholarship to inspire Israel to conquer our homelands, based upon the model of Moshe Rabbeinu.

       Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not confused with the Gods of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require k’vanna & creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented wisdom commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar, the definition of prophetic wisdom. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

       The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The Av tuma witchcraft which declares: as above so below – rejects the Revelation of the Torah first Sinai commandment: השם לא בשמים היא; the god of Israel post Sinai vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal הבדלה that differentiates the revelation of רוח הקודש מידות which quicken and cause the Yatzir Ha-Tov to live & breath. Herein defines the k’vaana of Oral Torah common law Court-room justice as the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Goyim world contrast-view reads their Bible or Koran — Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate inferior Gods, who do not actually exist at all. Hence their Av tuma avoda zara promotes the theology known as Monotheism. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim theology does not determine the god of Israel.

       The curse of g’lut: Jews lose the skill required to do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment – Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes a דיוק satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Assimilated Rambam, another ‘latter day’ Mormon-like fool; he embraced the Arab tawhid and ruled that Jews could daven in Arab mosques, and his Guide philosophy based upon Aristotle rather than פרדס logic; that Allah the same god of Sinai – despite the cold hard fact that Goyim, specifically Muhammad, reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets never sent דוקא to Goyim; both Moshe and Yona sent to lands not included in the oath sworn to the Avot as the inheritance of their Cohen seed to cause g’lut Israel to remember the brit and do t’shuva. The Pauline ‘original sin’ replacement theology perverted the introduction of the Torah curse/theme of g’lut\exile and substitutes – the belief system, messiah Jesus God saves from sin.

       The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history together with the NT & Koran, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through Religio-political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives, “Word of God”. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

       Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Gere Toshav living within the borders of the Cohen brit republic. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah written Constitution determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

       The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel, based upon the contrast between the בראשית Divine Names from the first Sinai Name. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – if taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. The sophomoric Bible mistranslations and Koran serve as witness. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

       That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah, (the Founding Fathers of the American Republic serve as witness), does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic; based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God NT theology – invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

       Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization; it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame Goyim as bound by any such universal natural law – in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings unto a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move, that created a new Judaism religion. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam “God” imposes through his Roman-like statute law religious codification. Oral Torah logic employed by Sanhedrin justices to interpret law based upon precedents. The lights of the P’rushim hanukkah serve as witness that assimilation to Greek culture and deductive reasoning causes Israel to forget the Torah.

       T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim – who to this very moment in time do not accept this Sinai oath brit blessing\curse-Life/Death judicial justice-g’lut oppression faith obligation. Yonah sent to Nineveh, serves witness. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins – based upon the Pauline theology-doctrine: Original Sin. The “repentance” made by the king of Assyria – only an Indian Summer. Goyim not delivered from Egyptian slavery, therefore Goyim incapable of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut the time-oriented Torah brit which creates the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations.

       The בראשית “Creation story” introduces Av time oriented wisdom commandments. בראשית does not introduce something other than the revelation of the Torah at Sinai judicial common law. Based upon the כלל that a opening “Thesis Statement” followed by “particulars which validate” the thesis statement through specific particulars כלל-פרט.

       The Bavli aggada -does – mention Noahide categories, but not as a system, any more than the Creation story instructs that the Universe created in some silly טיפש פשט literalist reactionary reading. D’varim defines two types of Goyim in the brit oath-land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people. Mesechta Sanhedrin aggada address ger toshav and mesechta Baba Kama halacha – Nacreeim. Talmud does not ever refer to Goyim in foreign lands as having to obey the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Because Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah – inclusive of the Book בראשית.

       Mesechta Avoda Zara and Chullin teach that a Hebrew Goy slave – a ger toshav. Another proof: Orpha decided to return to her Moavite family. The דיוק clear, she returned to Moav and abandoned keeping the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Ruth by contrast, returned to Israel and serves as the model of the mitzva ger tzeddik.

       [If] every nation establishes its own god, such as did Casear, and Mao; and HaShem breaths tohor middot – only the Oral Torah god of Israel – when we rule our homeland with righteous judicial common law courtroom justice — [then] What status of divine justice operates outside this Sinai brit? Each people by making their own Gods, as either Heads of State or theological belief systems etc. The Code of Hammurabi – approximately 600 to 800 years older than the commonly accepted date for the Sinai revelation after the liberation of the Israelites from Egypt, serves as witness. History testifies that throughout human history national leaders have assumed the role of God of their people/kingdom. Sinai does not sit atop of any universal pyramid. Rather the revelation of the Torah at Sinai — a different “mountain” entirely.
5. 

   Kata Fisher March 6, 2026 at 1:41 pm #

   Dear Professor Falk,

   The Nature and the Attributes

   Asma-ul-Husna (99 Names of Allah)

   Transliteration/s (from Hebrew roots of the Language, only). 

   Hebrew Concordance: ’ĕ·lō·hîm — 680 Occurrences

   Hebrew Concordance: ḇê·lō·hîm — 12 Occurrences

   The Seed of the Woman

    Genesis 3:15 Hebrew Text Analysis

   The Seed of the Woman = Messianic Person (He)?

   We can, or we CAN NOT, study the Person of Jesus of Nazareth as the Seed of the Woman (Mary, a descendant of King David, and the birth she gave).  But we also have to – or DO NOT HAVE TO study the People of the Sacred Texts, their Languages, as well as the People who rewrote the Secret Texts and their Languages.  

   Also, Nazarenes (The First Church) were persecuted, killed, and made to disperse in 70 A.D., as they ceased to exist, and thereafter came the Gnostics.  From the Gnostics and that chaos, Constantinopolitans had something to go about, LOL.

   With that, the third set of the Post A.D., understanding of the Person of Jesus of Nazareth as the Seed of the Woman, and all the writings and the Scriptures that came along with it.

   I avoid Theology, or Systematic Theology (in Word and Practice), because I have never found it helpful; most of them do not include the entire Sacred Writings and are not beneficial to the Church’s Faith in which I was raised and grew up, as a Roman Catholic. 

   Bear in mind that I am Roman Catholic; however, I do find that the Holy Quran is a Book of Great Knowledge and Grace – Grace that is sufficient concerning the Name of Allah (El o him / Al o him, — just some possible transliterations of root language/s of the Ancient Writers/ Re-writers).

   We may be missing the Nazarenes of 70 A.D. and their languages to understand it. 

   Perhaps, we are missing their Landmarks, and by them Given Landmarks, just as well.

   It is definitely a very interesting part of human history, and a continuation. 

   Contemporarily, they are going insane with diabolical abuse of the Ancient and Apostolic Church Order, and fellowship with all that, figuring out their landmarks and everyone else’s.

   What people THAT WERE IN Ancient Land have failed to do is ask for their Ancient Landmarks, where they are applicable, at all, to them at that time – or even now.  

   Contemporary HAVE NOT done that — because of the weapons of the war/s, diabolical ingenuity are more profitable – AND THIS HAPPENED just because they all could not resist the lucrative trade and fellowship with those who were and are in diabolical satanic seals.  

   All their jokes are upon them, and with them.  They should know very well what it means to manipulate ecclesiastical items, and also the Ancient Existence in the Ancient Territory, altogether. 

   Until they pass through Hagar-Sarah’s womb in Marry, Mother of Jesus (and Seed of that woman) … I doubt that they will be sufficiently “saved” no matter which text they have or read.

   The anointing of the Divine Spirit fell upon David – but was not in David — that Divine Spirit. He/ david could not keep up with the Law without being in the Law of the Spirit — to Keep the Law of the Spirit.

   I hope you are doing well and continuing in the joy of the Spirit as all these terrible things unfold and hopefully end soon.

   w/ Love

   K.F.

   Reply
6. 

   Kata Fisher March 9, 2026 at 12:16 pm #

   Dear Professor Falk,

   Hopefully, there can be a fresh start.

   I just saw that the son of the late Supreme Leader of Iran has been appointed to his father’s responsibilities.

   That being the case, I believe that in the best interest of all of the contemporary people involved, and especially now, after Gaza’s aftermath, state governments need to allow for dialogue between Rabbis and Imams, about their plans for the future of the laypeople that they find on their territories in ME.

   I really enjoyed the Rabbi’s writings and grains of salt in it.

   The interest of spiritual continuation for the people in all territories has to be looked at from a broad and bright perspective, as well as their human continuation (in correction and/ or on the path of Grace/salvation — or damnation). With the Jewish community in Iran, this is possible. 

   They all know very well that they must go through theological doctrines, put dates/times on them, and figure out which ones are valid. 

   Certainly, they have much going on, as well as much to come, concerning their responsibilities and custodianship over their territories, as well as Gaza.

   They all must stop what they are doing now and start listening to each other. 

   They need to quit listening to those who are in satanic seals and doctrines of that, and fellowship with that.  They are and will continue to be in diabolical labyrinths with them – that is their way, and they do not have any other.  

   I believe that can be a good start between Israel and Iran, as well as the ME region.

   They will never get to the wisdom that they need, and direction between the people involved without being focused and truthful dialogue.

   They will not solve their problems with stubbornness and delusions.

   They have too much going on right now, and plenty with those who are in satanic seals, theologies and doctrines of it.

   They all need to look at the reality that is before them, and how their responsibility and custodianship, spiritual/natural, is actually doing, and going — in the Middle East, in contrast to those who are in satanic seals, and doctrines of it.

   They all do not want to continue in the dance in which they are with all of that.

   I hope that they all can get to see all that.

   Iranian Muslims, Jews, and Church have some tough custodianship, and spiritual responsibilities to go about in ME, and especially now with the New Supreme Leader of Iran.

   It is said that Ark of the Covenant has the tablets of Commandments, Manna, and Arron’s staff. That is very interesting, at last.

   K.F.

   Reply
7. 

   Kata Fisher March 9, 2026 at 8:24 pm #

   Dear Professor Falk,

   I also just read this article.

   They are missing people (and anointings of those people/siblings to solve their problems). They can’t do it alone.

   It is terrifying thing that what is going on.

   K.F.

   Queen Noor pleads with King Abdullah II to free son Prince Hamzah, once heir to Jordan’s throne

   Reply